Cisco Firepower 4100 Series vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Firepower 4100 Series’ 1-rack-unit size is presented by the vendodr as ideal at the Internet edge and in high-performance environments. They further state that it shows what’s happening on your network, detects attacks earlier so you can act faster, and reduces management complexity.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The majority of attacks and exposure to malicious content occurs during the normal course of web browsing activities, which requires the ability to allow safe, secure web access for all users. URL Filtering with PAN-DB automatically prevents attacks that leverage the web as an attack vector, including phishing links in emails, phishing sites, HTTP-based command and control, malicious sites and pages that carry exploit kits.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Editions & Modules
Firepower 4100
50,000-250,000
per appliance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series
8.5
4 Ratings
1% below category average
Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging7.74 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability9.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server5.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.4 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(4 ratings)
9.5
(6 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Firepower 4100 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
When we are asked by local partners which security equipment we use we always recommend our Cisco security products. The Firepower firewall is no exception and we can easily recommend this to others who need a fast, secure, and well built system that integrates well with all your existing hardware and software.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Because of it's complexity, Palo may not be well suited for a small organization that may not have dedicated networking staff. But for a mid to large-sized enterprise, Palo shines.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • VPN Site to Site
  • High Availability / Failover
  • Ldap mapping to vpn connections
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Threat Detection and Prevention (Malwares, Un-Authorized Access)
  • Out of the box patterns for threat detection
  • Built in and Updated identification patterns
  • Unified Dashboard/Alerting on anomaly
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • The failover process is clunky. When out Fortigate firewalls failed over, we lost 1 ping. When our Firepowers failover, whether it is on purpose or not, we experience a 2.5 minute complete outage.
  • Cisco could stand to improve their support documentation. I have found it difficult to find good directions for configuring these, especially when it comes to NAT and IPSEC tunnels.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Steep learning curve
  • The top-down URL filtering match can sometimes be tricky and requires some expertise in setting up the desired policy
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
In general, the Cisco Firepower 4100 Series works well, great performance, support a high volume of traffic, configuration, users, the device is powerful and once you have something configured you can be sure that it will rarely fail but for day to day troubleshooting or modifications needed can be a little complicated due to you have to deploy every change you make in the device and is not as fast as other devices, in general a deploy takes 5 minutes.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
Palo support is excellent, and I have never had to wait when contacting them for support. One of the best support teams in the business, in my opinion.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Cisco Firepower 4100 Series deployment is straightforward and easy to implement. It is also can support high availability and able to achieve redundancy. Besides, firmware upgrade is quite simple and the process does not take much effort as the upgrade will be automatically done by itself. Cisco Firepower 4100 Series is also very cost effective compared with other similar ranges of firewalls.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering is the best solution to work with Palo Alto Firewalls and Panorama as an orchestrator. We choose Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering as it could reach the success criteria during the PoC.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Positive impact would be our increased security network wide.
  • Another positive would be the increased processing power, saving us time and [from] needing more equipment.
  • A negative impact would be the increased need for having to learn a new interface.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Palo has been an excellent investment for us.
  • Having robust URL filtering built into the same device as the firewall saves the cost of a separate appliance and improves performance.
Read full review
ScreenShots