Cisco Firepower 9300 Series vs. Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Firepower 9300 Series
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco Firepower 9300 series is presented by the vendor as a carrier-grade next-generation firewall (NGFW) ideal for data centers and high-performance settings that require low latency and high throughput. With it, the vendor providdes, users can deliver scalable, consistent security to workloads and data flows across physical, virtual, and cloud environments.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Palo Alto Network’s Next-Generation Firewalls is a firewall option integrated with other Palo Alto security products. Released in late 2023, the PA-7500 ML-Powered NextGeneration Firewall (NGFW) enables enterprise-scale organizations and service providers to deploy security in high-performance environments.
$1.50
per hour per available zone
Pricing
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Editions & Modules
Firepower 93000
17,000-30,000
per appliance
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Users may also choose to pay per gigabyte of data used starting at .065/GB. Note that prices listed here reflect installations via Amazon Web Services. Pricing may differ if other service providers are used.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Considered Both Products
Cisco Firepower 9300 Series

No answer on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Chose Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Palo Alto Networks firewall is compatible with Panorama and Prisma Access solutions. Together they work like a great package.
Features
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Firepower 9300 Series
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
8.7
26 Ratings
1% above category average
Identification Technologies9.01 Ratings9.426 Ratings
Visualization Tools9.01 Ratings8.025 Ratings
Content Inspection9.01 Ratings9.426 Ratings
Policy-based Controls10.01 Ratings9.626 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP9.01 Ratings9.025 Ratings
Firewall Management Console10.01 Ratings8.626 Ratings
Reporting and Logging10.01 Ratings8.026 Ratings
VPN9.01 Ratings8.426 Ratings
High Availability9.01 Ratings8.825 Ratings
Stateful Inspection10.01 Ratings9.025 Ratings
Proxy Server9.01 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.2 out of 10
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.4 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Firepower 9300 SeriesPalo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
While Cisco Firepower 9300 Series is an enterprise-grade Firewall solution, it might be less suited for businesses with restricted IT budgets. Still, Cisco Firepower 9300 Series meet all cybersecurity and compliance requirements and is the best option available at this moment in my opinion.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Anywhere where high performance and application-specific rules are necessary would be a great fit. Palo Alto NG firewalls are exceptionally well suited to doing application-based rules, rather than service-based rules, although they can still easily do those. The cost might make it less well-suited for smaller installations or where the more complicated setup procedures are too much for a user with limited proficiency to handle.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Tracking and containing of malwares and potential threats
  • Monitoring over network, users, and appliances
  • All-in-one centralized security dashboard
  • Threat control
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The PA handles VPN connectivity without missing a beat. We have multiple VPN tunnels in use for redundancy to cloud-based services.
  • The PA has great functionality in supporting failover internet connections, again with the ability to have multiple paths out to our cloud-based services.
  • The PA is updated on the regular with various security updates, we are not concerned with the firewall's ability to see what packets are really flowing across the network. Being able to see beyond just IP and port requests lets you know things are locked down better than traditional firewalls.
  • It is a great overall kit, with URL filtering and other services that fill in the gaps between other solutions without breaking the bank.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Frequent video tutorials about Firepower 9300 Series
  • Flexible subscription licenses
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • The interface is a little complicated at first. This is common for all firewall products I've used but Palo Alto could definitely update the UI.
  • Firewall rule audits are cumbersome. I have been using third-party tools to assist with the management. It would be great if Palo Alto could build out this functionality within Panorama.
  • Best-Practice Assessment (BPA) is not well advertised. These are very useful but require reaching out to your rep. Palo Alto should look at automating this and building it into QBR touchpoints with their customers.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
The PA5220s have far exceeded what we have expected out of them. It was a bit of a learning curve coming from another vendor, but everything falls into place now with ease. The capabilities of the solution still surprise us, allowing us to remove other costly hardware and providing a single point of management needed
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
PA Series firewalls provides good value for the price spent on them. Specially the 3K and 5K series devices contains hardware which keeps the management access smooth even during the peak hours of data traffic. The next gen firewall filtering services does function well (except for some bugs).
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
We've run into a couple undocumented bugs, but that seems to happen with every brand and technology. Any time we've had to engage Palo Alto support they've always been professional, knowledgeable and prompt. In almost all cases we've been able to resolve our issues without having to escalate our tickets.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
N/A
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
We are using Cisco ASA before in our environment but when it comes to deep scanning & layer 7 security it doesn't have that capability. After using Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall we are using sandboxing & advance malware protection that provides high-level end-user security. Also after implementing it we can easily monitor user-level traffic.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Met yearly compliance requirements
  • Boosted trust in investors
  • Secured IT environment
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • We used to outsource our Firewall and it's management. Not only did we find their SLA's to be lacking, in general, but communication between us was horrible. Many times we could not understand them and that resulted in less than desirable rule creation or troubleshooting.
  • Since we no longer have to pay a company for 24/7 management (and SLOW SLA's) we are saving a ton of money each year. Also our fellow employee's are much happier that things can be resolved in a timely manner.
Read full review
ScreenShots