Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo vs Imprivata OneSign

Likelihood to Recommend

Great for organizations that need to deploy a solution that is used by a small group, given that Duo charges per account; however, be careful if you have a lot of service accounts that you want to set to bypass MFA, as you will have to pay for each one of them, as you would for any human user. Also good for small IT teams that need a solution that has a very straightforward and easy-to-use GUI. Finally, while it has a decent amount of features and functionality, don't expect it to be able to do every permutation of policy that you can think of, though Cisco is promising future updates and solutions (e.g. an adaptive product) that will address some very specific use-cases, such as MFA bypass based on user and IP.

Read full review

Verified User

Engineer in Information Technology

Financial Services Company, 201-500 employees

View all 97 answers on this topic

It's a very good tool for anyone in the industry who wants to deploy Multi Factor authentication to make their company safe and secure. It is best suited for companies where a majority of the workforce works in the field; and access to company data using internet can be a little risky. Imprivata One-sign will make the connection more secure and safe.

Read full review

Sujeet Swain

Senior Consultant

InfosysInformation Technology & Services, 10,001+ employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Pros

Duo Security has a convenient mobile app, so all our employees can implement it and login when and where they need to.
The app is streamlined and simple, and doesn't contain ads or unnecessary features.
Duo Security allows our employees to not only use it for their company login, but for external logins as well, so all of their dual-factor authentication data is in one app.

Read full review

Verified User

Professional in Product Management

E-Learning Company, 501-1000 employees

View all 97 answers on this topic

Allows admins to enable single sign-on to additional applications without Imprivata services. After a quick training session with Imprivata, most admins are easily able to enable additional apps.
Works well with many device types including Windows, IGEL, Teradici and many Linux based thin clients.
High availability and failover. Imprivata's implementation of this was one of the most well thought out and easy to implement of any solutions in our stack. It works very similar to Active Directory, but requires no real config or settings to make it happen. Add an additional appliance and the enterprise is automatically synchronized. If an appliance goes down, client software is aware and automatically switched to another appliance.

Read full review

Paul Pettit

Co-Founder / Partner

SpadafyInformation Technology and Services, 11-50 employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Cons

An extra step to configure when setting up with things like O365 products whereas the native client would have been easier.
At the time of implementation it did not integrate with the rest of the cisco security suite.
Documentation was light or lacking for any lesser known products.
Had to configure ManageEngine as a "generic app" when doing SSO. Really need to build out the prebuilt app's base quicker for us lazy IT people.

Read full review

Ryan Lee

Enterprise Infrastructure Supervisor

KLJCivil Engineering, 501-1000 employees

View all 97 answers on this topic

Building the application profiles is not always simple.
Better application integration with Java would be beneficial.

Read full review

Verified User

Director in Information Technology

Government Administration Company, 501-1000 employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Likelihood to Renew

Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo 9.1

Based on 1 answer

It’s best in class

Read full review

Verified User

Manager in Corporate

Telecommunications Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Usability

Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo 9.1

Based on 59 answers

This is a very easy application to use. The installation is simple, the user interface is user friendly. If you have been reading my review to this point, you should understand very well that I have said that this is a good product to use for multi-factor authentication. From an administrative point of view, deployment was easy as well.

Read full review

Randy Palmer

Manager, Training & Learning Development

DHI Computing Service, Inc.Computer Software, 201-500 employees

View all 59 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Support Rating

Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo 9.0

Based on 93 answers

Overall the support that Duo and a great company like Cisco provides has been excellent. With the initial setup and integration of Duo, the tech people we dealt with were super helpful and walked us through the whole process. They provided adequate training and resources for our internal IT team to set up and run the application. We haven't had any major issues with our end-users.

Read full review

Verified User

Project Manager in Product Management

Biotechnology Company, 201-500 employees

View all 93 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Implementation Rating

Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo 9.1

Based on 1 answer

Rich documentation was provided by Duo team.

Read full review

Verified User

Manager in Corporate

Telecommunications Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Duo is easier to use since it is an app and only needs your phone for authentication. The other products I have used in the past require a separate device. Everyone carries their phone with them so there is no need to remember to carry around another device.

Read full review

Verified User

Director in Information Technology

Higher Education Company, 10,001+ employees

View all 97 answers on this topic

None of the other toolsets offered Epic integration. I spent 9 months testing other SSO tools and found them to be slow and tied to specific tools and or workflows only. Imprivata OneSign was the only truly universal tool that I could find that was adaptable.

Read full review

Mark Moran

Sr. Systems Engineer – Windows Architect

Ally Financial Inc.Hospital & Health Care, 10,001+ employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Duo Security has been a positive ROI in that it has prevented unwarranted access to confidential information.
Duo Security has been a positive ROI in that it keeps me informed of what's going on with my devices.
Duo Security has been a negative ROI in that it costs money that I'm not sure is well spent all of the time.

Read full review

Thomas Young

CEO (Chief Executive Officer)

Econometric StudiosFinancial Services, 11-50 employees

View all 97 answers on this topic

Increase in security prevents lost revenue due to fines over security breaches.
Easier password management allows for smaller tech team.

Read full review

Sean McIntire

Virtual Desktop Administrator

Beaufort Memorial HospitalHospital & Health Care, 1001-5000 employees

View all 5 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

Yes

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Duo / Cisco Secure Access, by Duo Editions & Modules

Edition

MFA	$3.00¹
Access	$6.00¹
Beyond	$9.00¹

Per User Per Month

Additional Pricing Details

—

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Imprivata OneSign Editions & Modules

—

Additional Pricing Details

—