What users are saying about
49 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.6 out of 100
Based on 49 reviews and ratings
73 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.8 out of 100
Based on 73 reviews and ratings
Feature Set Ratings
Endpoint Security
7.9
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
79%
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) ranks higher in 7/7 features
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) ranks higher in 7/7 features
Anti-Exploit Technology
8.0
80%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.9
79%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Centralized Management
8.7
87%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support
7.2
72%
6 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Infection Remediation
7.6
76%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Vulnerability Management
7.1
71%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Malware Detection
8.7
87%
17 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Secure Email Gateway
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
8.5
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
85%
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway ranks higher in 7/7 features
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway ranks higher in 7/7 features
Anti-malware
N/A
0 Ratings
8.4
84%
13 Ratings
Cusomizability
N/A
0 Ratings
7.7
77%
13 Ratings
Data Loss Protection
N/A
0 Ratings
9.0
90%
11 Ratings
Threat Detection
N/A
0 Ratings
9.0
90%
12 Ratings
Sandboxing
N/A
0 Ratings
9.0
90%
10 Ratings
End-to-End Encryption
N/A
0 Ratings
9.6
96%
11 Ratings
Management Tools
N/A
0 Ratings
7.1
71%
13 Ratings
Attribute Ratings
- Mimecast Secure Email Gateway is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
82%
17 Ratings
8.8
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
88%
25 Ratings
Usability
8.1
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
81%
12 Ratings
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
N/A
0 Ratings
Support Rating
8.0
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
80%
20 Ratings
8.9
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
89%
10 Ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
Cisco Secure Endpoint is a very good endpoint protection solution. It would be particularly good for someone with the time and ability to really work with it to get the most out of it. This would include the other Cisco product integrations and systems that it works well with.
Network Administrator
Plainfield Community SchoolsEducation Management, 501-1000 employees
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
Mimecast has been great at filtering our email for spam, phishing attempts, and potentially dangerous email attachments. We have been very happy with the reliability of the Mimecast services - I don't remember it being down in 2 years of using the service. My one complaint is that the admin console is not very easy to navigate, which makes some of the services difficult to implement. That being said, their support team has been great about walking us through these issues.
IT Administrator
JMA Energy Company, LLCOil & Energy, 11-50 employees
Pros
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
- Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
- Great automated actions features such as host isolation
- Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
- Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
- Great value
- Low false positive rate
- Lightweight agent
- Variety of reporting
- Stable agent
IT Security Manager
RS&H Inc.Design, 1001-5000 employees
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
- Email retention - convenience for the end-users to access older messages even if they've deleted them from Outlook
- SPAM management - allows us to prevent SPAM and Phishing attacks with custom policies that fit our organizational needs
- URL protection - allows incoming emails with a URL to be scanned and protects our end-users from clicking on malicious URLs

Verified User
Technician in Information Technology
Legal Services Company, 1001-5000 employeesCons
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
- Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
- Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
- Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.

Verified User
Engineer in Information Technology
Education Management Company, 201-500 employeesMimecast Secure Email Gateway
- The Admin Management console is absurdly complicated. For every first time we wanted to setup we've had to call their support for assistance. Support is quick and fantastic but it's so difficult to do anything yourself. They seem to have gone out of their way to call features unique things instead of using standard language from other providers so you as an IT professional know what you're looking for to setup.
- They have lots of KB articles, which their support will point you to. They are written on the most basic level and don't actually provide the help you need. For example, the KB page will tell you the list of options on the page... but not actually tell you what you do, why you might use them, or define their terminology.
- Their email threat management system has several nice features. One of the features available is that it will rewrite links in emails so that users click the link and it sandboxes the link, testing it on their server space and the user sees it there. This means the actual link in the email gets changed to the address of one of their servers. As a law firm, the EXACT LINKS are important to maintain in our communications and editing actual data from our clients to point to a Mimecast server is an unacceptable practice. I wish they had an alternative that did not edit the link itself on the page.
Technology Systems Manager
Gentry Locke Rakes & MooreLaw Practice, 51-200 employees
Pricing Details
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—Usability
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.1
Based on 12 answers
AMP is very difficult to use compared to other products we've seen. It's hard to understand why there are so many different logins for the various products that supposedly integrate with AMP. We had weekly phone calls for months to implement the product yet none of the IT department really enjoys using this product or feels comfortable with the accuracy of detections. The number of false positives is high.

Verified User
Employee in Information Technology
Aviation & Aerospace Company, 501-1000 employeesMimecast Secure Email Gateway
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) 8.0
Based on 20 answers
Like most Cisco products, Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints has a great knowledge base on Cisco's community portal, but unfortunately the Cisco support team cannot always clearly describe the solution for your issue, especially if it is related to the demo period. Nevertheless, Cisco goes to great efforts to improve your current situation with Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints support.
IT Project Manager
SvitSoftInformation Technology & Services, 11-50 employees
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway 8.9
Based on 10 answers
When calling them you get best in the world customer services but as previously mentioned their online community and capabilities are a bit lacking. They want you to log into their portal to see updates on issues (vs. using a public facing service) and I rarely find the answers to my issues in electronic format. Their online presence is only helpful with the simplest of issues.

Verified User
Manager in Information Technology
Construction Company, 51-200 employeesAlternatives Considered
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
Being all products of a similar nature, Cisco Advance Malware Protection stands out for its simplicity, low resource consumption, reporting, work dashboards and integration with the rest of the already installed suit.
Those are the most notable aspects, although the rest of the solutions were very good, all the capabilities added together make this product surpassing.
Infrastructure Manager
Grupo LogÃstico AndreaniLogistics and Supply Chain, 5001-10,000 employees
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
Previously we have only used the default on-premise exchange that comes with SBS. This was very simple and only provided basic filtering of spam and junk mail. We weren't able to filter impersonation mail or emails with malicious code
IT & T Manager
Havwoods Accessories LtdConstruction, 11-50 employees
Return on Investment
Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP)
- AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
- The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.
Cyber Security Analyst
Associated Wholesale GrocersWholesale, 1001-5000 employees
Mimecast Secure Email Gateway
- Positive - It's hard to put a dollar amount on prevention, but we have been saved many times by the email and URL security filter. Users have clicked on links which were blocked by Mimecast. We have avoided costly ransomware and virus situations many times because of this.
- Cost savings - Mimecast has worked with us to set reasonable prices, especially because we are a non-profit. At the time of purchase they were significantly cheaper than their closest competitor (Proofpoint).
- Subscription cost. This is a subscription product so overall it can be more expensive than an on-premise solution. However we feel that the cost was well worth the security benefits.

Verified User
Director in Information Technology
Non-Profit Organization Management Company, 1001-5000 employees