Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) vs Panda Security for Desktops

• Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
• Great automated actions features such as host isolation
• Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
• Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
• Great value
• Low false positive rate
• Lightweight agent
• Variety of reporting
• Stable agent

Read full review

• Constant scanning of the entire computer.
• Does not affect the performance of the device.
• A lot of features to protect the computers in different layers.
• A control panel where you can manage all the features in a simple way.
• High level of effectiveness when detecting threats, attacks, malware, etc.

Read full review

• Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
• Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
• Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.

Read full review

• Panda Security is not the best at some types of malware scans but that can be an issue with other similar products as well.
• The configuration and setup functions could be more detailed and expanded for advanced users.
• Updates can sometimes be infrequent.

Read full review

• AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
• The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.

Read full review

• It has helped me on multiple occasions to eliminate infections from my PC. I have avoided having to reinstall the operating system or format my system and lose some important files.

Read full review