3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.6 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

You can really use [Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)] for any threat big or small. It helps to drive you towards which product you need to be looking at. It does not allow you to easily drill down into the info you need to make a good decision. It is also not a reporting tool.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

During an incident investigation, the more information you have about the case is better, so having Watson to bring extra details about the attacker saves a lot of time during an investigation.I don't see a scenario where the IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson is not advised. In my opinion, this plugin brings value to any company, from small SOC teams to large SOC teams.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

  • Brings all data to one central point.
  • Shows data connections
  • Integration with case books very well
  • Allows third party enrichments
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

  • Providing additional information on incidents (e.g. attacker information, file-hash checks, etc.).
  • Gathering tons of informations on related IPs.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

  • It is so slow
  • There is no good way to export data for a report or Managment
  • The interface is clunky
  • Wish there was an AI to intelligently add related events
  • Automation is very hard to use
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

  • No major issues, but the "machine learning" capabilities still having some room for improvement.
  • Some of the findings are false positives and may require manual check.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson 9.0
Based on 1 answer
I personally haven't used the IBM support for the specific QRadar Advisor with Watson. However, I have few years dealing with the general IBM QRadar support team and I can say they are really helpful, specially when you get to the engineer-level support. In years working with the IBM support, only one time we had to wait few days for an answer.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

Cisco is ahead of the game in setup. There are so many pieces you have to put together and configure from scratch and tweak to come come close to what securex has.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

No answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

  • It helps us easily Id the full extent of a threat
  • It saves time searching for data.
  • It only gives basic info I wish there was greater integration between all security offerings
  • It allows other techs to pick up where you left off.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

  • The Watson plugin decreased the time to investigate cyber incidents.
  • Watson also increased the quality of the investigations.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Cisco SecureX (formerly Threat Response)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

IBM QRadar Advisor with Watson

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison