Cisco SecureX vs. Trellix Intelligent Sandbox

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco SecureX
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Threat Response automates integrations across select Cisco Security products and accelerates key security operations functions: detection, investigation, and remediation. Threat Response integrates threat intelligence from Cisco Talos and third-party sources, which adds context from integrated Cisco Security products automatically so you know instantly which of your systems was targeted and how.N/A
Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Trellix Intelligent Sandbox (formerly McAfee Advanced Threat Defense) enables organizations to detect advanced, evasive malware and convert threat information into immediate action and protection. It includes additional inspection capabilities that broaden detection and expose evasive threats. Integration between security solutions—from network and endpoint to investigation—enables instant sharing of threat information across the environment, enhancing protection and investigation. Deployment…N/A
Pricing
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Considered Both Products
Cisco SecureX

No answer on this topic

Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
Chose Trellix Intelligent Sandbox
Honestly, I personally haven't found any tool for antivirus as effective as McAfee Advanced Threat Defense. I had six months of experience with Cisco SecureX and I wasn't satisfied with anything from scanning speed to the repairing and removal of viruses. Although the price of …
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Small Businesses
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.1 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Palo Alto Networks WildFire
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(12 ratings)
9.9
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco SecureXTrellix Intelligent Sandbox
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
This is perfect for organisations with small or limited security teams who want to get more from their Cisco and third-party investments. With Secure Endpoint makes detecting and responding to threats much easier. Any organisation looking to overhaul its security infrastructure or even wrap around its cloud-first strategy with solutions such as Intune should seriously look at Cisco’s suite of products. I’ve implemented Secure Endpoint, Umbrella, and Duo for customers primarily using Intune for device management, and the cool new insight features in Cisco SecureX really help with visibility over their estate.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee Advanced Threat Defense is great in large enterprise environments with large, highly segmented networks. The administrator can create exceptions for specific applications as well as create exceptions through HAS which is very convenient for applications created in house. I do not recommend installing it on a computer with little ram memory, since this product demands a lot of resources and can be clearly distinguished in the Windows task monitor.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • So the product enables end users to get visibility into their security environment, not only across the Cisco products but across the third-party products as well. The product also automates detection and response. So the product really offers end-user efficiency in the security operations center.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Virus and threat prevention
  • Sandbox option
  • VPN
  • It does run flawlessly in background
  • It can detect email threats too
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Of course, many companies prefer to obtain security from the cloud; however, not all of them prefer it, which is why having a local implementation would allow these companies to also use said software as their ally for their security.
  • Working with this software can be simple, that is, any threat can be visualized with greater precision, but when it comes to managing its orchestration, it is a bit complex.
  • Its integration with other software can be simple but with others it is not, that is why it would be ideal if all of them could be carried out in the same way.
  • Integrating with a larger number of third party software would be of great help, to further enhance the analysis and detection of threats.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • There should be more updates.
  • It is heavy on our system's storage or we need a high-storage system to run this tool.
  • Its pricing is disappointing.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
Personally, I have only called our internal IT team about needing changes to permissions, not McAfee itself, but our IT team can make the changes though it seems to take them longer than I would think it needs to take. As someone who administers a different program, with different permissions, I would feel they should be able to make the exceptions faster and easier.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
A lot of the look and feel of both products is quite similar. There's several best practices on visualization that are followed in both and integration of common telemetry is comfortable and quick. But while Microsoft ATP offers deep insights into mostly the Microsoft environment and a limited view into other common sources, SecureX shines in all the non-client areas Microsoft's product seems lackluster in.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee brand is used, mcafee antivirus scan, mcafee drive encryption, mcafee DLP, mcafee cloud proxy. He Kaspersky at the corporate level and used his admin dashboard is a bit rough. I recommend mcafee since the graphical environment is very friendly with the administrator. We selected it because at the administration level it is more comfortable, support for end users is very easy, the administration console can create roles and segregate permissions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • It helps us easily Id the full extent of a threat
  • It saves time searching for data.
  • It only gives basic info I wish there was greater integration between all security offerings
  • It allows other techs to pick up where you left off.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It does provide real-time threat prevention
  • Good customer support
  • System needs high configuration for seamless operation
Read full review
ScreenShots