Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) vs. Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco SD-Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Software-Defined Access (SD-Access) provides automated end-to-end segmentation to separate user, device and application traffic without redesigning the network. Cisco SD-Access automates user access policy so organizations can make sure the right policies are established for any user or device with any application across the network.N/A
Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Cradlepoint in Boise offers the all-inclusive NetCloud Solution Packages for branch, mobile, and IoT networks combine tailored NetCloud services with fit-for-purpose hardware and a comprehensive support plan. NetCloud Solution Packages are cloud-managed and deployable anywhere in days, not months. Cradlepoint acquired the NetCloud technology with original developer Pertino in December 2015, and integrated the platform into their own services by early 2016.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco SD-AccessCradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
Cisco ACI
Cisco ACI
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
5.2
(8 ratings)
9.9
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
4.6
(8 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Software-Defined Access (SD-Access)Cradlepoint NetCloud Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It's well suited in our corporate offices, where all our business users resides and where we can control all their accesses. What doesn't really fit well is when we have our branch fronts, where all the software domain access features aren't utilized to its fullest, due to the fact that customers and users don't really need to have all the security features that SDA provides.
Read full review
Cradlepoint
The platform and product selection as a whole covers a lot of range. The pricing is low enough and the levels granular enough that even customers that only need the use of a few features of the product can buy into the ecosystem with reasonable investment and grow with confidence without having paid too much. One thing that this enterprise company gets is this: Many small companies need enterprise-class features but don't have the user count to justify purchasing enterprise-class solutions. It is not that they don't need advanced features, it's just that enterprise vendors assume that small companies only have basic needs. It is not true, but you can't buy a solution that is only sold in hundreds of seats if you have 25 users in your company. Cradlepoint NetCloud does a good job of getting this right. You can buy a single seat or hundreds of seats, and the price is truly commensurate with your seat count. Everyone gets the enterprise features, you only pay for the seats you need.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower.
  • Assurance [helps trace] issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as [the] best practices.
  • Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
Cradlepoint
  • Remote router management
  • Grouping and templating configurations
  • Notifications and showing cellular health
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Documentation: Working in this solution I realized there were missing information details about the fusion device support for nexus.
  • Fusion router: This roll in the fabric should be already integrated in the solution, right now it is configured manually.
  • Bugs: Unfortunately the solution still present a lot of bugs, mainly in the controller.
Read full review
Cradlepoint
  • Group management of devices could be easier.
  • Customized reporting would be nice.
  • The task scheduler is not very robust (only one task is available for scheduling).
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cradlepoint
Device management is nearly the same as if you logged in locally, giving a familiar feel to the interface. Device group management can be cumbersome when pushing firmware updates.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
As far as my experience with SD-Access -I'd say things that can be improved are - better functionality with ISE, ease to understand licensing and better documentation for configuration (add-ons, etc), and licensing.
Read full review
Cradlepoint
Every time I have engaged support, it has been a satisfying experience. Because they cover such a wide range of applications, I do have to spend more time explaining our intended results and rationale than I would have to do with a more focused vendor, but it's a minor tradeoff for the value of saved time in every other aspect of the solution.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cradlepoint
It is much easier to group your devices within NetCloud prior to deployment. We ran into issues of lost/changed settings when grouping devices that had already been deployed
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Automation, pushing template-based configuration to multiple devices in one push saves time and manpower. Assurance helps trace issues related to devices, clients, and provide the troubleshoot as the best practices. Segmentation, with the use of the SGT tags, we are able to achieve segmentation and micro-segmentation securely.
Read full review
Cradlepoint
The cost of equipment, lines, and services was over 1,000 times the five year cost of Cradlepoint (formerly Pertino) when looking for a complete WAN replacement. Using small Linux devices (Intel NUCs) instead of expensive networking hardware provided equal service levels when we needed passthrough site-based access, rather than buying specific hardware from a vendor (including even Cradlepoint, though the integration is great and I do recommend their devices - especially for their cellular data redundancy features)
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Integration with other platforms in a single platform is a great advantage for the user.
  • Saves time in configuring devices on the network
Read full review
Cradlepoint
  • It has freed me up to do more productive things instead of troubleshooting the VPN.
  • It has made my employees happier because they have less frustrations working from home or on the road.
Read full review
ScreenShots