Cisco TrustSec vs. IBM Security QRadar SIEM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco TrustSec
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
IBM Security QRadar is security information and event management (SIEM) Software.N/A
Pricing
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of Product A and Product B
Cisco TrustSec
-
Ratings
IBM Security QRadar SIEM
8.7
60 Ratings
11% above category average
Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings9.927 Ratings
Correlation00 Ratings8.960 Ratings
Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings9.527 Ratings
Deployment flexibility00 Ratings7.927 Ratings
Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings8.456 Ratings
Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings7.660 Ratings
Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings9.625 Ratings
Data integration/API management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings8.339 Ratings
Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings9.240 Ratings
Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings7.75 Ratings
Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings7.838 Ratings
Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings8.97 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Small Businesses
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud
Score 8.2 out of 10
AlienVault USM
AlienVault USM
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
Splunk Enterprise
Splunk Enterprise
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(81 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(55 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(51 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco TrustSecIBM Security QRadar SIEM
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
IBM
QRadar is very well suited on environments where there are not multiple tenants or domains, we do have success on this kind of scenario. IBM Security QRadar SIEM is less appropriate for environments with multiple tenants, specially when each tenant represent a different End Costumer (such as for MSSP companies), those environments require a high amount of rules and building blocks replications, since each tenant will have its own "BB definitions", servers, rules exception, etc. Also, some information, such as EPS count or EPS dropped are generated by QRadar's own log sources, which takes place on default domain, therefore users associated with different domain can not have access to those logs, even when the information is related to other domain's environment. For example, even if Event Collector 1 is associated to Domain A, the log informing its dropped EPS is generated by System notification, log source that must be associated to Default domain.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
IBM
  • Enables identification and prioritization of vulnerabilities in IT infrastructure for corrective action.
  • Facilitates security incident investigation and forensic analysis.
  • Provides a real-time view of security events, enabling immediate incident response.
  • Can integrate with external threat intelligence sources to enrich data and improve threat detection.
  • Enables the generation of detailed and customized reports.
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
IBM
  • Need to spend more time configuring the system to properly interpret and normalize different type of data collected from multiple resources.
  • While Rule creation QRadar uses that rules to detect security threats and generate alerts, but to creating and managing rules is bit complex & tedious work to complete.
  • IBM Security QRadar SIEM is excellent in handling large & complex systems that requires in-depth knowledge and extensive training to configure and maintain the system which includes upgrading, optimization of performance & issue troubleshooting.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
No answers on this topic
IBM
With the arrival of IBM Security QRadar SIEM at our company, we have a better vision of all the security needs that may arise, it is a very safe software to use that prevents threats from damaging our IT environment, it is impossible to change it for another software.
Read full review
Usability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
IBM
A very special system to use without problems, the process is very genuine and does not require complicated procedures.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
IBM
Customer support is Good of IBM, While Using IBM QRadar its deployment is to slow and suddenly stop working and crashed we have contacted IBM Support and Rised a Ticket within a few minute we get call back from customer support and Query Resolved by them Fast And Rapid Support of Ibm
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM Qradar takes the best from its competitors. Reliable and stable but sometimes very expensive, the SIEM from IBM offers a wide range of scenarios in which the customers can suite and size their own infrastructures. IBM Qradar doesn't really needs to stack up againt its competitors because it already sets an example in the SIEM world.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
IBM
  • Offense investigation was really helped in tackling the incidents. It was accurate and brief
  • The automation with IBM resilient (SOAR) was a milestone in elimination of user mistakes
  • The X-Force threat intelligence supported us in getting the work done without any 3rd party enterprise OSINT database
Read full review
ScreenShots