OpenText Documentum vs. ShareFile

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Documentum
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
ShareFile
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
ShareFile is a cloud-based file sharing and storage service built for business. The product was acquired by Citrix Systems in 2011.
$10
per month per user, per month, minimum of 3 users
Pricing
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
$10
per user, per month, minimum of 3 users
Advanced
$16
per user, per month, minimum of 3 users
Premium
$25
per user, per month, minimum of 3 users
Virtual Data Room
$67.50
per user, per month, minimum of 5 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
11% above category average
ShareFile
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
ShareFile
8.9
64 Ratings
5% above category average
Versioning00 Ratings8.050 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings9.042 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings9.339 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings8.358 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings10.061 Ratings
File search00 Ratings9.061 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings8.753 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
ShareFile
9.1
60 Ratings
5% above category average
User and role management00 Ratings9.357 Ratings
File organization00 Ratings10.060 Ratings
Device management00 Ratings8.048 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
-
Ratings
ShareFile
8.6
62 Ratings
1% above category average
Performance00 Ratings9.061 Ratings
Reliability00 Ratings9.562 Ratings
Storage Reports00 Ratings7.449 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
SugarSync
SugarSync
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.8 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
8.7
(88 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.1
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(19 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(14 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
1.1
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText DocumentumShareFile
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review
ShareFile
Sometimes we just need to send a single large file, and compressing it is easier than using ShareFile. But generally, we use ShareFile to exchange or send anything over 20 MB. A problem that we have not had [yet], but wonder about is this: Are ShareFile and its e-mailed links safe for transmission to/from U.S. Government computers? All of our public-sector clients are state and locality-based. We haven't had any interacton with U.S. entities. U.S. entities, especially DOD, are rather particular about these type of file-sharing sites and links embedded inside e-mails.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
  • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
  • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
Read full review
ShareFile
  • Authenticated electronic document signatures--self-signing, and sending out for signatures. This is a robust feature that also allows for additional information to be added to documents being sent for signatures, such as dates, notes, and items omitted but needed.
  • Encrypted emails through ShareFile, Citrix apps for Outlook, Gmail, and Mac email systems. Encrypted email messages cannot be cut/pasted, nor forwarded without encryption. If only the attachments need to be encrypted, the email message can be unencrypted. Also, two options for securely opening an encrypted email (one with less credentials, one with more).
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
Read full review
ShareFile
  • Users grow quickly (each client gets a separate account). Automated pruning would be nice.
  • I'm not aware of integration with Office365 online (only the outlook app). This could make it harder for some users.
  • It would be nice to have something that auto-scans emails and attachments for PII and would require Sharefile for those emails.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
ShareFile
The cost is fair and the program does what it has promised to do. Customer service is attentive. I'm not aware of any better-sounding file sharing systems out there that would tempt us to discontinue ShareFile.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ShareFile
ShareFile is so easy to use I was able to download all of my projects files and have them set up to sync before my supervisor could even come over to explain the process to me. It is a neatly organized and intuitive software that allows even the less tech-savvy to become power users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ShareFile
The software has never been down when I needed to use it.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ShareFile
Easy to use, easy to integrate with Outlook. I only gave it a 9 because I have found that sometimes it does not play nicely with Outlook and can slow it down. But, when that happens (not frequent), I restart Outlook and all is well again
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
ShareFile
Typically the support is very knowledgeable and interested in following an issue until it is fully resolved. I have not had any issues working with their staff as they are all polite and easy to communicate with. If the first or second level tech does not fix the concern then it is escalated until we get to someone who can close the case.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ShareFile
Good documentation for the API. With a little help from RS tech staff, any competent programmer should be able to integrate RightSignature with an existing system in a week or three. That help is easy to get as well
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review
ShareFile
ShareFile is easier and does what you need. I have moved a few organizations from SharePoint to ShareFile. Just easier. You can setup different areas for different departments, setup their permissions and it is easy enough for them to do what they want in their zones. The mobile app works great as well. So you can all the features you really use from SP, but just easier to setup and use.
Read full review
Scalability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
ShareFile
I am a one person office. I have no idea how this software would scale to a larger office.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
ShareFile
  • It's been huge in allowing our freelancers to upload a doc or email comp into the system and initiate a workflow so that those inside the organization can provide feedback without the need of staying on top of emails/messages. It's all located in one place.
  • The time suck from the previously-mentioned annotations issue has caused me to lose some productivity as I have to 'wait my turn' to drop in an annotation, then have it removed, and re-attempt multiple times. Not a huge impact on ROI, but it does affect productivity.
  • From the product side, it is helpful for me to reference what the content will be on our website before the page goes up, as well as the copy we send to our retailers who resell our products. Our marketing lingo stays even across all touch-points because of ShareFile.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ShareFile Screenshots

Screenshot of ShareFile dashboardScreenshot of ShareFile Outlook PluginScreenshot of ProjectsScreenshot of Link sharing optionsScreenshot of ShareFile e-signature