Citrix DaaS vs. Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Citrix DaaS
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops, or XenDesktop) is a virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) and application virtualization solution from Citrix.
$375
Parallels RAS
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS, formerly 2X RAS), is application virtualization technology, billed as a solution to extend the life of legacy OS (like Windows XP) with its virtual desktop for any device. Maltese company 2X Software developed the technology, but was acquired by Parallels (in Seattle, WA) in February, 2015 to extend their cross-platform support solutions.
$120
per year per user
Pricing
Citrix DaaSParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Editions & Modules
Virtual Apps
$375
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Citrix DaaSParallels RAS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Citrix DaaSParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Considered Both Products
Citrix DaaS

No answer on this topic

Parallels RAS
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Citrix is a great products but very expensive. That's why we choose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS). Citrix is a great products but very expensive. That's why we choose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS). Citrix is a great products but very …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
We evaluated Citrix as well as Parallels when we undertook this project, and our research concluded that not only was Parallels much easier to set up and use, but it was much more cost-effective.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Cost-effectiveness; Technical and Service Support.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
I think it's a pretty easy comparison of the two. Citrix is more expensive and more complicated compared to Parallels Remote Application Server; however, Parallels Remote Application Server misses the nice audio plugins that Citrix has for teams, etc. Parallels Remote …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
The cost of the two products is significantly different. Though Citrix has many advantages and features, the cost was a primary factor that helped us make that choice.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallels Remote Application Server is a cost-effective solution for Citrix and VMware products. It is also less complex to configure and manage. Offers similar connectivity options and integrates easily with 2FA authentication, for example from Google which is a free option.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
faster, leaner and more comfortable at the same time cheaper than Citrix, and in relation to the benefits to native RDS good price/performance ratio
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
For the time we've used Parallels, we've found Parallels much easier to set up and manage over Citrix.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
The least prerequisites for RAS server compare to other solutions. Server configuration is totally based on user load. Licensing model is impressive. The most important factor for us was the support. Parallels Remote Application Server support is more than expected and all …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Primary objective is save cost. Easy to configure policy and has more security
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallel RAS is so much easier to install than Citrix. Doesn't require a NetScaler for external access. The customizing for the login page is so much simpler they anything we have used. The single console helps our helpdesk staff manage clients much easier.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallels is far superior to basic RDS and is comparable to Citrix at less cost and hassle.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallels Remote Application Server competes against Citrix on a one-for-one feature setlist. It provides many of the same services and capabilities. It is, overall, a simpler product to use and configure. It does not compete perfectly in the VDI space, as the Citrix offering …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Setting up and managing Parallels RAS is extremely quick and easy. Support in the form of manufacturer support is better. In general, support for resellers is better at Parallels and easier for resellers.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Citrix Virtual Apps has too many constraints to integrate into our corporate network.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
We use Citrix and RAS both, and RAS is a cheaper, simplified solution compare to Citrix.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallels Remote Application Server is easier for implementation and maintenance. Cheaper than Citrix.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Parallels RAS combines almost all features in one product.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
10 years ago we selected what was called 2X at that time, and is now Parallels, because it was much cheaper and easier to handle than Citrix Desktop. We have used it every day since although I believe the pricing nowadays is about the same. But we can't see any reason to change …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Set-up is many times faster especially for remote/external access. It takes hours with Parallels instead of the days it takes with other alternatives.
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Citrix Virtual Apps is quite complicated and requires about 8-10 servers, almost all redundant and duplicated. It seems to also require someone that is certified to be on your staff in order just to understand the setup, install, monitoring, and use. Citrix does have great …
Chose Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
We used (and still use) Citrix Xen App for about twelve years, but when compared with RAS, which has been used for testing several times for around 5 years and is in production since the beginning of 2019, there are powerful but subtle differences that make RAS a better choice …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Citrix DaaSParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Small Businesses
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
VMware Fusion
VMware Fusion
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Citrix DaaSParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(54 ratings)
8.7
(140 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(4 ratings)
8.7
(18 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(6 ratings)
7.8
(16 ratings)
Availability
8.4
(2 ratings)
9.6
(3 ratings)
Performance
7.4
(4 ratings)
8.6
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
7.9
(8 ratings)
8.6
(129 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.3
(2 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(4 ratings)
8.5
(9 ratings)
Configurability
8.4
(2 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
2.4
(4 ratings)
9.4
(2 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.2
(2 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
5.2
(2 ratings)
9.4
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.0
(2 ratings)
9.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Citrix DaaSParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
Likelihood to Recommend
Citrix
Citrix Virtual Apps & Desktops is best in class for offering a great user experience in VDI, server-based sessions, or published apps. Using additional GPU allows uses like rich video, 3D apps, and great modern uses (MS Teams, Office 365, Zoom, etc.). Citrix products are very well integrated (Citrix Virtual Apps & Desktops used with Citrix ADC is the best way to secure access and monitor everything).
Read full review
Alludo
Parallels RAS can be used in many scenarios, It can be a VDI platform for desktop replacement and a move to a more central virtualized infrastructure. It can allow you to publish a cloud app that can be accessed from anywhere on nearly any device avoiding the need to install anything on device. I can see its value in Retail, Remote services, Manufacturing, schools, etc. anywhere with an internet connection. It adds a secure layer in front of RDP services. It can be used to allow secure access to desktops or laptops from outside the office if this is something you need to do
Read full review
Pros
Citrix
  • Enables remote access anywhere, to any device which eliminates managing the endpoints how traditional VPN would require.
  • Integrates well with modern applications to offer optimized user experiences similar to native applications which increases user acceptance.
  • Extremely flexible in how policies are applied to different use cases to ensure the appropriate security mitigations are in place with minimal effort.
  • Easy to maintain and expand environments to fit business needs.
Read full review
Alludo
  • The printing driver is quite excellent, both in the Parallels Client and on the HTML5 client.
  • Setup is incredibly easy; the default setup is very functional, and adding features is a breeze.
  • Speed is very acceptable in general for end-users, the clients adapt quite well to the amount of bandwidth available, and features are available to adjust further.
  • Automation through PowerShell is great.
  • Support is usually quite fast and efficient.
Read full review
Cons
Citrix
  • A single console to manage the environment.
  • The configuration is a bit complicated and we have hired Citrix administrators. But it's a good solution.
  • User profiles need improvement. They could use more stability and more functionality as well as user profile redirection.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Enable users' access to their personal computer drives when accessing the cloud services through Parallels RAS.
  • Limiting and controlling the access to server resources for the users.
  • Need improvement in managing the resolution of service accessed via RAS Client (works well via RAS Browser, though).
  • Improve access to personal and organizational print and scanning devices from the cloud service.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Citrix
Because it has been a mainstay of our business for many years.
Read full review
Alludo
We have been using Parallels since it was called 2X - it is a major part of how we do business. It is fairly simple to use and maintain - staff like it, we like it. It is a product that makes a promise - and it keeps it. As Parallels evolves, and clean bandwidth becomes more readily available everywhere - it just makes sense to continue to use Parallels in our environment
Read full review
Usability
Citrix
Getting the environment setup took me three months of off and on work, with 3 complete rebuilds of the environment. Utilizing the WebUI to access the environment had presented so many random issues that we had to require end users to use the Citrix Reciever App. As it was the only stable solution. Aside from that, it hasn't required much admin intervention since the stand-up was completed.
Read full review
Alludo
You do not need to be an expert in IT to configure, manage or train anyone to use RAS. Everything about deployment was simple and straightforward although I do wish the integration with okta and SAML was there and it didn't require the use of Active Directory for certain parts of the deployment. We eliminated AD and use Okta exclusively but without the integration we are forced to setup local users and use WORKGROUP on the server. Not terrible, just not as streamlined or secure
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Citrix
Xendesktop did a great job with HA of all the components.
Read full review
Alludo
If there are any issues with Parallels - they are usually more about the server operating systems than Parallels itself. It would be rare for us to have any reason to take Parallels offline - we schedule a reboot on the servers at 3am to keep the O/S itself fresh, but again - it is not a Parallels issue. If individual users have any issues we ask them to completely log out of parallels - which ends their session - and then back in - and that typically resolves the issue right away.
Read full review
Performance
Citrix
The performance of XenDesktop is the best in the industry because of the fine-tuned protocol and years of updating. Overall, I don't think there is a better performer on the market. The question is if the added complexity of running XenDesktop is really worth the performance gain. While the latest version of XenDesktop is the easiest to deploy so far, it is still more challenging than the competitors.
Read full review
Alludo
I am giving Parallels 9/10 on this one because the only application that sometimes seems slow or has issues - is Microsoft Outlook. It is sometimes the result of a pop-up that may not show up in the published application (vs full desktop). Other than that - pages load very quickly - and it does not seem to slow down other applications that are running at the same time. Most of our users run Outlook, softphone and Teams locally - and published applications for everything else. When they do that - it is very solid.
Read full review
Support Rating
Citrix
The support is great when you get an engineer that knows what they are doing but getting that individual sometimes takes a while. Overall, they are professional and polite and competent in their knowledge. Sometimes the cases are open for an extended period of time which becomes very frustrating when dealing with critical issues.
Read full review
Alludo
Good support in place if required, very helpful when it comes to upgrades or any issues faced. The support team is knowledgeable, friendly, and quick to respond to issues The company also provides a range of online resources, including a
knowledge base, documentation, and forums, which can be helpful before raising a ticket
Read full review
In-Person Training
Citrix
I was self trained
Read full review
Alludo
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Citrix
Easy to understand and learn at my own pace
Read full review
Alludo
Documentation is fair but sometimes a little difficult to follow
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Citrix
Take it slow and read the directions each step of the way. If you are not familiar with Citrix products, use a reseller or other experienced engineer to assist you in the setup of your environment
Read full review
Alludo
Overall, it was pretty simple compared to most other projects. Again, we had a strong familarity with the product so there was not much of a learning curve. Our 'biggest' issue is the end-user understanding of a 'local' application and a published application. For example - Online meetings need to run locally for camera/video to work smoothly so opening a link to a meeting from a published application continues to be an occasional issue.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Citrix
I never had the chance to test other products like these since whenever I read and searched online during the first phase it was only popping up Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops.... so we got in touch with the sales department and the rest is history. After the technical consultation, it was more obvious that the implementation would have been very easy and the security layers are very well for my company.
Read full review
Alludo
Compared to other offerings, including Citrix and MS plain RDS - this product provides a different level of experience. Its load balancing capabilities are simple to roll out, and an entire farm can be up and running in hours, NOT days. Its OS independence and minimum resource usage, along with its RDS server optimization policies, make it very resource efficient.
Read full review
Scalability
Citrix
Easily scalable
Read full review
Alludo
We added our Integrated Services Staff to parallels, with filtered, published applications - in a single afternoon. We added licensing and installed the desktop client software on multiple platforms both in the office and at remote sites all on the same day - and got remote users that had never used the product up and running - very quickly.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Citrix
  • XenApp has allowed us to continue support of legacy applications and all access of those applications to users across the globe with any device.
  • XenApp can also manage software licenses by restricting number of users, number of concurrent sessions, or combination of both to required specification.
  • While initial investment in XenApp can be costly, continuing support and upgrade are very cost effective and product stability is excellent.
  • While there are competing products from Microsoft and VMware, when it comes to remote application access, XenApp is the best of breed.
Read full review
Alludo
  • Our customers have had dramatic cost decreases due to no longer needing IT departments to work with our software.
  • We've been able to charge more for our hosting services due to our customers saving money in the long run. Parallels Remote Application Server has more than paid for itself, and the increased income has gone right back into the business.
  • Both our customers and our company have benefited from this transition.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Parallels RAS Screenshots

Screenshot of Parallels RAS supports on-premises, private and public cloud providers, including Azure and AWS, from a single console.Screenshot of The Parallels Web Client is accessible from any HTML5 browser or choose one of the many local clients.Screenshot of Parallels RAS integrates MSIX app attach for modern, dynamic app delivery.Screenshot of Parallels RAS supports multiple MFAs for security and flexibility.Screenshot of Integrated Let's Encrypt security certificates, to issue and manage certificates in Parallels RAS.Screenshot of Expression-based filtering makes it easier to set policies in the Parallels RAS.