CloudApper CMMS vs. FacilityBot

It's ideal for people who have a smaller budget but want a fully-fledged CMMS solution. Moreover, it's ideal for everyone who is looking for more than a CMMS solution, as the solution provides access to a platform that has other enterprise apps. It might not be ideal for those who want cutting-edge tech such as IoT sensors support, predictive maintenance, etc. Other than such organizations, it's best for everyone else.

Facilities Managers spend their days ensuring that the building operations are running smoothly and efficiently. Using FacilityBot helps them to digitize their FM workflows so that can manage their time more easily and effectively. It's all about working smarter, not harder! The asset management function of FacilityBot is also beneficial and useful. The tool also provides easy-to-read statistics reports for users.

• Our organization was able to handle tasks and projects linked to maintenance operations with the help of CloudApper CMMS.
• CloudApper CMMS helped us to reduce operation costs by combining the functions of asset management, maintenance, and inventory management in a single platform.
• A CMMS built for easier collaboration, project management, and task tracking.

• Fault Reporting
• Asset Management
• Preventive Maintenance

• A few issues need to be ironed out

• Limited checklist templates
• To have extension for the free trial
• There is room for improvement in terms of customization of simple reports.

As I said, CloudApper CMMS has made our work so simple, it is difficult for us to use any other software. It is so easy to install that any one can be trained without any hassle. The data we receive based on CloudApper CMMS helps us to take certain decisions which are important for us.

The CloudApper CMMS app is highly affordable. I have looked for few apps before I made my final decision to purchase this one. Plus their customer service is excellent. They have helped me unexpectedly during my journey to start with this apps which is very rare to find this days.

FacilityBot replaced multiple layers of coordination and communication between users and subcontractors. There are many facilities management systems that are not user-friendly on the market. Most of them do not support multiple communication methods and are costly. Unlike FacilityBot, the implementation wasn't as straightforward. In terms of features, not many are as feature-rich as FacilityBot.

• It has reduced machine downtime significantly
• It has helped improve the efficiency of the maintenance team
• It has improved collaboration regarding maintenance

• Quick and prompt fault reporting and tracking
• Save cost and resources
• FacilityBot also provides simple and evaluated statistics