Cloudflare Zero Trust Services vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare's Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) technologies create secure boundaries around applications. When resources are protected with ZTNA, users are only allowed to access resources after verifying the identity, context, and policy adherence of each specific request. Cloudflare's Zero-Trust-as-a-Service model enables users to deploy access controls on the company's instant-on cloud platform, backed by Cloudflare's global network.N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint (formerly Microsoft Defender ATP) is a holistic, cloud delivered endpoint security solution that includes risk-based vulnerability management and assessment, attack surface reduction, behavioral based and cloud-powered next generation protection, endpoint detection and response (EDR), automatic investigation and remediation, managed hunting services, rich APIs, and unified security management.
$2.50
per user/per month
Pricing
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Academic
$2.50
per user/per month
Standalone
$5.20
per user/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
-
Ratings
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
9.4
6 Ratings
7% above category average
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings9.26 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.56 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings9.56 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings9.35 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings9.26 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings9.56 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings9.56 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 9.1 out of 10
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 9.1 out of 10
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(4 ratings)
9.0
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(3 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesMicrosoft Defender for Endpoint
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudflare
For example, Cloudflare is a very good solution for ZTNA implementation. Cloudflare has Warp for propagating Gateway rules and checking device posture. Browser Isolation gives you more abilities to use internet resources without any restrictions and at the same time not put the company at risk. For example, if there is no DLP solution in place blocking the printing function can partly protect the company's sensitive data from intentional or intentional leakage through the online forms. A similar approach protects the end-user device from Zero-day threats and malicious software code. Moreover, Remote Browser Isolation technology protects not only the user's device but also the user himself from possible phishing attacks - for example, even if the user enters his username and password on the phishing website, bank card issuers, or other personal or confidential data, data will not go beyond the isolated cloud environment. Cloudflare Access gives company administrators a great opportunity to implement role-based access policies and make effect segmentation and diversification of company network groups.
Read full review
Microsoft
Small or large organizations will benefit from using MDE. They need to provide a way to buy MDE as a standalone add-on product not only make it a bundled feature in Microsoft 365 E5. I wish it had the ability to deploy updates to 3rd party apps when the vulnerability scanner discovers a vulnerability. Currently, I have to use a 3rd party tool to address this gap.
Read full review
Pros
Cloudflare
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It is great at proactively monitoring threats across the network. It works seamlessly with the client to monitor individual user computers, and it has a good real-time scanning engine.
  • On the client side, Windows Defender doesn't require a whole lot of system resources to run, nor will it create unnessary slowdowns of a computer, even while scanning for threats
Read full review
Cons
Cloudflare
  • Very API [oriented] which is fine, but the GUI is sometimes inconsistent
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Virus detection rates are below competitors.
  • Too many notifications that end up bothering.
  • Do not ask every time if you should send reports to Microsoft.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cloudflare
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
Microsoft
Every time I've had a question or a problem, I was able to get it addressed quickly. Microsoft has a huge database for ATP support, and it has contained 90% of what I have looked for. It was a lifesaver during initial setup.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cloudflare
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than FortiClient does.
Read full review
Microsoft
Defender works better for my org. This may depend on your ecosystem, however for me, Defender is a clear winner. I like Defender's ability to utilize multiple sensors and data points to detect possible breaches. I like the built-in EDR functionality. I do not need to purchase a separate EDR software anymore. I really like the vulnerability management. it has enabled our SOC team to view multiple security-related sensors from a single portal.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cloudflare
  • Complete solution in case of using with Cloudflare Access.
  • No need of maintenance.
  • No skilled staff and trainings required.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • There is definitely a piece of mind provided when you know that your system will not get compromised because of malware and viruses.
  • The fact that I don't have to spend money in the first place means that I can spend money on other more important things that do require it.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Screenshots

Screenshot of BlocksophisScreenshot of Detect & respondScreenshot of discover vulnerabilityScreenshot of Eliminate blind spotsScreenshot of Eliminate risks