Likelihood to Recommend
For example, Cloudflare is a very good solution for ZTNA implementation. Cloudflare has Warp for propagating Gateway rules and checking device posture. Browser Isolation gives you more abilities to use internet resources without any restrictions and at the same time not put the company at risk. For example, if there is no DLP solution in place blocking the printing function can partly protect the company's sensitive data from intentional or intentional leakage through the online forms. A similar approach protects the end-user device from Zero-day threats and malicious software code. Moreover, Remote Browser Isolation technology protects not only the user's device but also the user himself from possible phishing attacks - for example, even if the user enters his username and password on the phishing website, bank card issuers, or other personal or confidential data, data will not go beyond the isolated cloud environment. Cloudflare Access gives company administrators a great opportunity to implement role-based access policies and make effect segmentation and diversification of company network groups.
Read full review
Burp Suite is a good general tool to test websites as long as your website is not too large or you have the time for it to complete. We have some websites that only about five to ten minutes for Burp Suite to complete an attack and a spider only takes about two minutes. Other websites have taken a few hours to complete. I have seen a tester actually run Burp Suite against one of our websites and it took all day to complete.
Read full review Pros Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level. Excellent protection for remote users. Best in class browser isolation techniques. Read full review The passive scan feature is really awesome, it kind of covers areas that you might miss. The CSRF POC is really helpful to my team. It helps development team see the issue and understand it. Burp intruder and repeater are the features I myself and my team uses the most as it helps us use our payloads in a variety of different ways. Active scan helps the team to ensure coverage for the whole application. Read full review Cons Very API [oriented] which is fine, but the GUI is sometimes inconsistent Read full review More features to be available for the free/community version to allow more learning Manual updating of plugin without network connectivity More controls with the manual testing with scenario inputs Read full review Usability
Given this tool's wide area of testing functionality for mobile and web applications, it's a great tool to invest in for security testing. Though it lacks documentation to carry out particular vulnerability findings which are very challenging for a new user of this tool
Read full review Support Rating
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
BurpSuite does not have an amazing customer support. All the major help that you will find is from public forums and Google. Although you will find all the required information on Google, still at time professional support helps you solve the problem in much less time and make your operations go smoothly.
Read full review Alternatives Considered
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than
Read full review
The only other tool I use that works like Burp Suite is the OWASP ZAP. It works a lot like Burp but just has a different layout. I prefer how Burp has the tabs for Repeater, Intruder, Decoder, ect.
Read full review Return on Investment Complete solution in case of using with Cloudflare Access. No need of maintenance. No skilled staff and trainings required. Read full review Positive impact, time to complete security development stage is decreased. Very positive impact on budgeting for external penetration testing. We can do the bulk of the common testing ourselves now. Read full review ScreenShots