Cloudflare Zero Trust Services vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare's Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) technologies create secure boundaries around applications. When resources are protected with ZTNA, users are only allowed to access resources after verifying the identity, context, and policy adherence of each specific request. Cloudflare's Zero-Trust-as-a-Service model enables users to deploy access controls on the company's instant-on cloud platform, backed by Cloudflare's global network.N/A
Tufin Orchestration Suite
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Israeli company Tufin offers a firewall security management offering via the Tufin Orchestration Suite, including SecureApp for managing network connectivity, SecureChange network change automation, and SecureTrack multi-vendor and next-generation firewall management.N/A
Pricing
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
-
Ratings
Tufin Orchestration Suite
8.2
2 Ratings
0% above category average
Policy planning and rule management00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Device Discovery00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup00 Ratings9.32 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.7 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(4 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesTufin Orchestration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudflare
For example, Cloudflare is a very good solution for ZTNA implementation. Cloudflare has Warp for propagating Gateway rules and checking device posture. Browser Isolation gives you more abilities to use internet resources without any restrictions and at the same time not put the company at risk. For example, if there is no DLP solution in place blocking the printing function can partly protect the company's sensitive data from intentional or intentional leakage through the online forms. A similar approach protects the end-user device from Zero-day threats and malicious software code. Moreover, Remote Browser Isolation technology protects not only the user's device but also the user himself from possible phishing attacks - for example, even if the user enters his username and password on the phishing website, bank card issuers, or other personal or confidential data, data will not go beyond the isolated cloud environment. Cloudflare Access gives company administrators a great opportunity to implement role-based access policies and make effect segmentation and diversification of company network groups.
Read full review
Tufin
Well suited scenarios - 1) Firewall Policy / Ruleset management 2) Where all the products are from Tufin like TOS ST, SC, SecureApp etc 3) Where customer focuses on ruleset compliance - USP violations, and other features Less suited - 1) Agnostic/distributed environment - Tough with integrate with 3rd party like CyberArk 2) FW recertification processes / exception process when complex process is included
Read full review
Pros
Cloudflare
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
Tufin
  • Firewall management
  • Compliance reports
  • Unused rules and optimization
  • Policy Automation
Read full review
Cons
Cloudflare
  • Very API [oriented] which is fine, but the GUI is sometimes inconsistent
Read full review
Tufin
  • Palo Alto Networks Integration
  • Better/more user friendly api for integration with ticketing systems
  • Web UI structure is not user-friendly
Read full review
Support Rating
Cloudflare
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
Tufin
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cloudflare
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than FortiClient does.
Read full review
Tufin
1) Fairly okay overall but definitely needs improvement overall Vs the other products available in the market like Palo Alto XSOAR 2) Cost wise okay at the beginning but when client demands add-ons/ more features/customization tailored to their needs, Tufin Orchestration Suite recommends RFE / custom costs/development costs 3) USP feature is cool to use overall Vs FireMon 4) Tufin ProServ needs to buckle-up/Support compared to other competitors in the market
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cloudflare
  • Complete solution in case of using with Cloudflare Access.
  • No need of maintenance.
  • No skilled staff and trainings required.
Read full review
Tufin
  • I think if you correctly configure your SIEM, you don't need Tufin. You can correlate a lot of things for firewalls.
Read full review
ScreenShots