Cloudflare Zero Trust Services vs. Webroot DNS Protection

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cloudflare Zero Trust Services
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare's Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) technologies create secure boundaries around applications. When resources are protected with ZTNA, users are only allowed to access resources after verifying the identity, context, and policy adherence of each specific request. Cloudflare's Zero-Trust-as-a-Service model enables users to deploy access controls on the company's instant-on cloud platform, backed by Cloudflare's global network.N/A
Webroot DNS Protection
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Webroot DNS Protection redirects web traffic away from unsafe or inappropriate web content.
$150
per 5 seats
Pricing
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
DNS Protection
$150.00
per 5 seats
DNS Protection
$690.00
per 25 seats
DNS Protection
Contact sales team
per 50+ seats
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(4 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cloudflare Zero Trust ServicesWebroot DNS Protection
Likelihood to Recommend
Cloudflare
For example, Cloudflare is a very good solution for ZTNA implementation. Cloudflare has Warp for propagating Gateway rules and checking device posture. Browser Isolation gives you more abilities to use internet resources without any restrictions and at the same time not put the company at risk. For example, if there is no DLP solution in place blocking the printing function can partly protect the company's sensitive data from intentional or intentional leakage through the online forms. A similar approach protects the end-user device from Zero-day threats and malicious software code. Moreover, Remote Browser Isolation technology protects not only the user's device but also the user himself from possible phishing attacks - for example, even if the user enters his username and password on the phishing website, bank card issuers, or other personal or confidential data, data will not go beyond the isolated cloud environment. Cloudflare Access gives company administrators a great opportunity to implement role-based access policies and make effect segmentation and diversification of company network groups.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
If you already have Webroot AV, it makes sense to continue with the same vendor. It's pretty cheap compared to some solutions, so it might be the case that it's this or nothing, in which case this is a no brainer. If you are an MSP, this is an easy product to sell, and requires very little maintenance. you do need to monitor it but it runs itself most of the time. If you are a customer with >50 users, you should really be looking for a product that is a bit higher up the food chain
Read full review
Pros
Cloudflare
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • Enforcing organisational policies regarding internet usage, such as blocking access to certain types of websites (e.g., gambling, social networking, etc.)
  • Prevent malware infections
  • Protection from various phishing attempts
Read full review
Cons
Cloudflare
  • Very API [oriented] which is fine, but the GUI is sometimes inconsistent
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • Integration with G-Suite, O365, Active Directory, SIS, etc.
  • Increase the number of third-party integrations.
  • It can be expensive to implement, depending on the size of the network.
  • It does not offer additional features and options beyond basic protection.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cloudflare
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cloudflare
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than FortiClient does.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
Webroot stacks right up with the top vendors in this tier. Priced right and MSP ready.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cloudflare
  • Complete solution in case of using with Cloudflare Access.
  • No need of maintenance.
  • No skilled staff and trainings required.
Read full review
Webroot, an OpenText company
  • Much reduced time spent on malware issues at small business customers
  • Slightly increased revenue as this fills a space that didn't used to exist in our stack
  • Customers satisfaction went up due to the added ability to block certain content quickly and easily
Read full review
ScreenShots