CloverDX vs. Hydrograph

CloverDX designer as a standalone is well suited for fairly straightforward transformations of data. If you want to do large scale data integrations, then their server edition adds an extra level of automation and job control.

Incentivized

hydrograph is very usefull when we need to analyze big data. in our scenario it helped a lot with rdms databases

Incentivized

• Connects with Salesforce very well
• The graphical view of the transformations allows for easy creations and maintenance
• Support has always been eager to assist with any graph creation difficulties I run into

Incentivized

• Coupling between complex model and MapReduce framework without reducer procedure was simplified.
• The ability to reduce execution time and handle partial failure
• The framework adapts to higherned complex model

Incentivized

• The initial learning curve is a little steep. Not very steep or super steep, just a little steep.
• Having enough memory for large multi-step problems can be an issue if the graph isn't designed well.

Incentivized

• Microsoft azure is recently joined in 2020 that can be improved.

Incentivized

While CloverDX has an active forum for users to submit questions and assist with answers, their in house support team is incredibly responsive when I've contacted them for assistance. This seems almost at odds with most other software companies who try to save money on tech support by promoting a forum or knowledge base.

Incentivized

CloverDX was a less expensive alternative to Talend and had a more intuitive interface from what I could see during the evaluation.

Incentivized

Snap logic fits good for small/medium whereas hydrograph suits even for Enterprise grade.

Incentivized

• Work that use to take multiple people 20 to 30 hours a week to complete each has now been fully automated to where only 1 or 2 hours a week for maintenance is required.

Incentivized

• Their is no tangible ROI for us Management of bid data is easy.

Incentivized