CMiC Construction Platform vs. FinancialForce PSA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CMiC Construction Platform
Score 7.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
CMiC Project Management is a construction project collaboration and management solution. It centralizes project-related communications and documents onto one platform, and connects the job site with the back-end office.N/A
FinancialForce PSA
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
FinancialForce Professional Services Automation software is also a cloud-based services solution that is built on the Force.com platform. It allows companies to manage professional resources, customers, projects and financials in one integrated services management application. Because PSA works natively with Force.com, it utilizes the same data for sales, services and finance on one system.N/A
Pricing
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing available upon request.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
6.2
28 Ratings
16% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data5.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history6.322 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration6.818 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.5.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting6.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management6.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)5.818 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
6.3
22 Ratings
12% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.622 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors6.114 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment7.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration5.115 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files6.719 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.318 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management5.914 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
5.4
17 Ratings
31% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets5.417 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
7.0
51 Ratings
16% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.139 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.550 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports7.041 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability7.348 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
6.7
101 Ratings
12% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing6.664 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing5.860 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists6.278 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation6.574 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports6.485 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing6.085 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools7.986 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals7.191 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings5.951 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app6.561 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management7.381 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists6.543 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes6.947 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications6.536 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders7.755 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
6.7
54 Ratings
17% below category average
FinancialForce PSA
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools5.220 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing7.750 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.042 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator7.629 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation4.927 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
FinancialForce PSA
9.0
11 Ratings
16% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings9.011 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings9.09 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
CMiC Construction Platform
-
Ratings
FinancialForce PSA
9.0
10 Ratings
16% above category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
FunctionFox
FunctionFox
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Procore
Procore
Score 8.8 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 8.8 out of 10
Kanban Tool
Kanban Tool
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(110 ratings)
9.0
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(6 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.8
(6 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
5.9
(95 ratings)
9.0
(6 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.5
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(5 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CMiC Construction PlatformFinancialForce PSA
Likelihood to Recommend
CMiC
  • The platform is well suited for tracking project financials. The direct tie between the project budgets and costs on the accounting side makes this platform extremely valuable as we have real time cost data to make decisions from.
  • The platform is great in that it integrates the majority of our major processes. We can track a pursuit in Opportunity Management and push that information directly to a project. We hire people through the system and they are available to input on a project. We track time and pay people through CMiC and even manage our equipment fleet. This one platform satisfies a lot of our business needs, which makes our technology stack a bit easier to manage.
  • The platform as it stands today is not well suited for mobile consumption. We have users not use the mobile platform due to issues with losing data when not in wifi and issues with not understanding how to use the system.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
PSA is great at capturing all the data you would need to accurately track and report on consulting projects. It captures project financials, calculates projected GM%, and (among others) allows for hourly tracking of employees, which breaks it up between billable and non-billable for utilization tracking to accurately understand costs. However, the user interface is tough to learn, and the stability of the data reporting functions is questionable. This tool would be great for smaller consulting shops that fit the standard contracting mold. If your business is fairly straightforward without a lot of shades of gray, you shouldn't have much trouble with the tool. However, if your business practices have a lot of exceptions based on clients, then you'll have a tall administrative task on your hands.
Read full review
Pros
CMiC
  • The user interface is similar to that of other project management software applications so folks in our company that had previously used other applications have been able to switch over fairly easily.
  • I really like the software and it was much less expensive than other applications.
  • I like the mobile application so that our superintendents can view the documentation on their phones.
  • I really like the punch list capability mobile field, however, we have a hard time getting our superintendents to use it for some reason.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
  • The biggest strength of FinancialForce PSA is that it's built upon the force.com platform, which means it is very easily customizable to our business needs.
  • Projects are easily created, as well as milestones and assignments.
  • "Actuals" (dollars and hours) are calculated automatically, and are easily reported on.
  • Resources are easily managed by using the Resource Planner
  • FinancialForce PSA support is outstanding!
Read full review
Cons
CMiC
  • Entering a code of the vendor instead of the company name while recording an invoice takes time and seems counter intuitive
  • Editing an invoice created through Image Management on the AP side is limited to description and address field. When changing the rest (invoice# or a date or an amount) - the whole trace of who entered/submitted/approved disappears. The way it works now is: deleting an invoice from the batch, locating it through Registry/invoice search, unsubmitting it, making changes, submitting, adding back to batch - time consuming
  • In Multiple distribution pop up window, when entering a new invoice, I'd make the field "Company" to be autofilled once "Job" is entered. It takes time to memorize what job number belongs to what company.
  • There is only web version available and it is limited compare to a desktop client. For instance I can only make one change at a time and save it. Multiple changes don't get saved in one click
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
  • The product is still maturing as a full featured PSA tool. The feature roadmap is compelling but is still being built out.
  • Tool is ideal for managing a services business. It is not yet a project manager tool.
  • Limited reporting
  • Maturing change order process
  • Limited integration to back-end financial systems beyond Financial Force Financials. We use Netsuite.
  • The underlying SalesForce UI is constrained and can be keystroke intensive at times
  • Limited archiving of historical data
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CMiC
This is a platform that would continue to be in the best interest for our company. I just hope that CMiC support removes the gaps between the enhancements that they create to better the system to what they currently have
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
There is another PSA software program that we have been looking into (DreamFactory) that could potentially replace FinancialForce PSA in our organization. Like FinancialForce PSA, it is cloud based on the force.com platform. Licensing is slightly less than FinancialForce PSA, and the Resource Management tool is far superior to FinancialForce PSA. With that said, our renewal falls in Q4 2014 and I don't foresee us implementing a new system this fiscal year.
Read full review
Usability
CMiC
I believe it isn't easy to use and is unintuitive. Undecipherable error messages appear throughout the application without indicating what is wrong or how to correct it, in my experience. The terminology on the screens is specific to Canada, which adds to the confusion.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
It is maturing and does what it does well although it is not fully complete.

Integration to SF is great.

Gives great visibility to incoming services projects and allows the staffing process to start on pipeline deals.

There are certain processes that take more click-throughs then needed so there are refinement opportunities around the UI.

The resource management screen and project status views have really matured since our original purchase, and while not perfect, allow business leaders to do their jobs.

Configurations vs. customizations. We seem to have to bring in an Apex developer to do a customization for changes I would think could be configuration settings
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
CMiC
Sometimes since this is a cloud based product the system can become slow but we haven’t had any issues of availability without CMiC first letting us know it would be down
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
We have maybe had 1-2 outages over 3 years.
Read full review
Performance
CMiC
Reports are pretty shown to run but general pages typically load pretty quick.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
Most of the time it is fine. There are peak periods of usage where performance noticably slows down (i.e., Monday mornings when time is due and many reports are being run)
Read full review
Support Rating
CMiC
The support team [has] been in touch with our deployment team and has given them effective guidance up to completion. It has helped us in [the] best methods of resource allocation and secure record-keeping process. We have tracked all our billing information and made the right payments with documentation and avoided [unnecessary losses]. [The] support team has [to] lead our teams to the right channels and empowering our team with the right skills for maximum production.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
Every time I submit a new help request, whether it's an actual help request or just a question about FinancialForce PSA, I always feel that I'm receiving world class support. The support we receive from FinancialForce PSA is always very detailed and professional. There are some requests that take longer than other for the initial response, which is why I did not give a full 10.
Read full review
In-Person Training
CMiC
The training was on system functions and not really how best to use it for our business. It would have been nice to be provided recommendations for use rather than just a blank slate of functionality.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
It was fine.
Read full review
Online Training
CMiC
I felt the training was good and the trainers knew the software.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
CMiC
Lots of confusion between sales and implementation regarding what was included and not included...the security encountered a "bug" and made it extremely difficult to set up roles and individual responsibilities
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
Appirio did a good job, however, the user team didn’t know enough to make all the right configuration/customization choices. The team focused too much on replicating existing processes vs. reengineering them. In hindsight we should have had deep dive reviews at key milestones and enforced more focus on how the software would operate. We didn’t have access to true best practices expertise. In hindsight, a consultant from the outside would have been helpful to drive this.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CMiC
CMiC Construction Platform is the best price point in the market. Others are revenue-based billings, and the annual fees reflect as such. CMiC Construction Platform support staff is generally amazing and offers real-time support on critical issues. The imaging and workflow functions are real-time savers. CMiC Construction Platform is generally a smaller and in touch organization that treats your team like their own and stays with you after the purchase.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
FF PSA is a robust Project Management solution that can be configured to fits any size business. We have tried several other applications and PSA so far has met and exceeded our needs. We run our day to day operations on Salesforce so having a solution that is native was a must have. PSA met that requirement and much more.
Read full review
Scalability
CMiC
CMiC has several key features that can either work together or independently depending on your companies needs.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CMiC
  • Better project visibility, surely. I can step into a former project and see how well/poorly it was run.
  • Forecasting underway - nearly complete with year 2.
  • Cost status tracking - this has been valuable, especially when figuring out how much of a liquid budget is left over.
Read full review
FinancialForce.com
  • FinancialForce PSA has helped us improve our data tracking and allows us to get more granular about our financial information and performance.
  • PSA has given more tools and reports to individual contributors to take greater ownership over their own data, and has increased accountability across the organization.
  • PSA has added a fairly hefty administrative burden to individuals, project managers, and our financial team.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CMiC Construction Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of CMiC FIELDScreenshot of CMiC AnalyticsScreenshot of CMiC Drawing ManagementScreenshot of CMiC FIELD