Coda vs. XWiki Collaboration Suite
Coda vs. XWiki Collaboration Suite
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coda | N/A | Coda, from Coda Project headquartered in San Francisco, is a template-based document generation solution, supporting a variety of use cases presented by the vendor as ideal for smaller companies that might otherwise be relying on spreadsheets to maintain (for instance) product development, or inventory tracking. It is available free, with paid editions to support teams, automations, or for more advanced collaboration and workspace features, as well as more advanced security features. | $0 per month | |
XWiki Collaboration Suite | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | XWiki Collaboration Suite (XCS) is a software solution that is built on top of the XWiki Enterprise Open Source project. According to the vendor, XCS tackles 2 main use cases: Information & Knowledge Management Collaborative Work It is available on premise or as SaaS and is packaged with XWiki SAS services. These services include: support, a yearly upgrade, initial setup and configuration. | N/A |
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | $4 seat | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | ||
Top Cons |
|
|
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Project Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Communication |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
File Sharing & Management |
|
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | PowerDMS Score 9.5 out of 10 | HCL Connections Score 8.8 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.9 out of 10 | Troop Messenger Score 9.6 out of 10 |
Enterprises | OpenText Content Suite Platform Score 9.3 out of 10 | HCL Connections Score 8.8 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.1 (25 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 7.8 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 8.2 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 4.5 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Coda | XWiki Collaboration Suite | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Pros | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Cons | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Likelihood to Renew | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Usability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Performance | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Scalability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
ScreenShots | Coda Screenshots | XWiki Collaboration Suite Screenshots |