Coda vs. XWiki
Coda vs. XWiki
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Coda | N/A | Coda, from Coda Project headquartered in San Francisco, is a template-based document generation solution, supporting a variety of use cases presented by the vendor as ideal for smaller companies that might otherwise be relying on spreadsheets to maintain (for instance) product development, or inventory tracking. It is available free, with paid editions to support teams, automations, or for more advanced collaboration and workspace features, as well as more advanced security features. | $0 per month | |
XWiki | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. This level of customization enhances the collaborative environment and operational efficiency. Key… | $12 per month 10 users |
Coda | XWiki | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | With Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise | 17% discount available for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Coda | XWiki | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros | ||
Top Cons |
|
|
Coda | XWiki | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | Square 9 Softworks Score 9.8 out of 10 | Front Score 8.9 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.4 out of 10 | RWS Tridion Sites Score 9.0 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Conga Composer Score 9.4 out of 10 | Guru Score 9.3 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Coda | XWiki | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 (25 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 6.0 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 7.8 (2 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 8.2 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 4.5 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 9.1 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 7.3 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Coda | XWiki | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Pros | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Cons | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Likelihood to Renew | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Usability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Performance | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
Scalability | Coda
| XWiki SAS No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | Coda
| XWiki SAS
|
ScreenShots | Coda Screenshots | XWiki Screenshots |