codeBeamer ALM vs. ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
codeBeamer ALM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Intland Software's codeBeamer ALM is a scalable Agile Application Lifecycle Management platform that focuses on traceability and compliance. codeBeamer ALM supports both Agile and Waterfall, and offers a scalable solution for both small and large organisations to develop better products faster. The vendor says their customers think about the benefits of codeBeamer ALM in terms of higher efficiency and effectiveness along the lifecycle, with the goal of cutting development time and…N/A
ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance provides the tools businesses use to proactively manage risk by measuring, testing and auditing internal processes. This solution helps business users ensure compliance to regulations, policies, standards and frameworks. It is available via the Standard, Professional, and Enterprise editions, the latter two supporting GRC and internal auditing processes.N/A
Pricing
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPerpetual and rented licenses available. Named users & floating license types can be combined.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons
Features
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Governance, Risk & Compliance
Comparison of Governance, Risk & Compliance features of Product A and Product B
codeBeamer ALM
-
Ratings
ServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
8.5
10 Ratings
7% above category average
Common repository of GRC items00 Ratings8.610 Ratings
Risk management00 Ratings9.010 Ratings
Integration with Corporate Performance Management (CPM) systems00 Ratings7.610 Ratings
GRC policy management00 Ratings8.410 Ratings
Incident management00 Ratings8.89 Ratings
Best Alternatives
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Rencore Code (SPCAF)
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Forcepoint DLP
Forcepoint DLP
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(1 ratings)
8.0
(11 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
7.4
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
codeBeamer ALMServiceNow Governance, Risk, and Compliance
Likelihood to Recommend
Intland Software
In my opinion codeBeamer is well suited for any activity where detailed tracking is needed with teams involved. It can be less suited for small projects which do not last long, or are not continuous, etc
Read full review
ServiceNow
Oracle EBS R12 requires a unique user skillset to understand how it handles user access and functions. Accordingly, ServiceNow has this high level of sophistication to manage this information and apply it to Sensitive Access and Segregation of Duties rules to identify exceptions. This depth of configuration is critical to accurately identify when Oracle Responsibilities (access) truly allows access and thus could be a violation. ERPs with less complexity may not require this customization of ServiceNow GRC, but you would be wise to raise these questions and examples in the demo to ensure it will work for you. In the past, we have found that risks of under-reporting exceptions or false positives become so voluminous that users don't always get to the accurate violations for timely remediation. Proper configuration up front will improve your effectiveness and ROI down the road.
Read full review
Pros
Intland Software
  • Tracing of requirements.
  • Tracking of development.
  • Tracking of QA.
  • Tracking of bugs.
  • Tracking of releases.
  • Wiki.
  • Users and teams.
  • Works for teams scattered across the globe.
  • Testing and coverage for releases.
  • Integration with SVN.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Finding reported by the auditor. GRC helps us identify, assign, and track the resolution of this.
  • Exception to information security policy. These require quarterly reviews and setting up reminders to revisit these.
  • Building out new projects and baking security and compliance into the project and tracking it in GRC to ensure we deliver a compliant product on day one
Read full review
Cons
Intland Software
  • Search.
  • Metric calculation.
  • Would be nice that cB is a source of truth, i.e., that say SVN commit is done only from cB; know this is difficult to achieve.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Delivering more out of the box functionality that rivals other GRC platforms. The bare bones approach may not help companies that do not have expertise or capabilities to build effective GRC processes.
  • Easier way to implement workflow.
  • Offering better metrics without buying add-on tools.
Read full review
Usability
Intland Software
Sometimes info in codeBeamer can be lost, in principle, if not well organized by the user, info can never be found, or can be forgotten about, etc
Read full review
ServiceNow
I'm satisfied with our experience. The configuration was the biggest challenge, but we have moved onto the stage of user training and usability. We would appreciate having better user training documentation and possibly videos and/or computer-based training to help our international users adopt this software for their GRC needs.
Read full review
Support Rating
Intland Software
Excellent support professionally. Also, thanks for giving me for free access to SaaS cB for my hobbyist project.
Read full review
ServiceNow
It's a good system, but I am awaiting key features in the new release. We hear that ServiceNow is continually adding new features and we look for improved reporting, better Oracle Integration, and user training opportunities. To the extent these materialize, we expect further improvements in our experience with ServiceNow GRC. Until that time, though, we believe we are meeting our objectives expected at the beginning of this project.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Intland Software
codeBeamer is by far better.
Read full review
ServiceNow
We just recently started using TrustArc for data privacy requests and I can already speak to the fact that TrustArc is a more confusing platform once there. The positives of ServiceNow would be that a majority of our URL's drive to owned websites which our employees are very comfortable with using versus pushing them to another website that feels unsafe.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Intland Software
  • Customer tracking.
  • Process tracking.
  • Workflow framework.
  • Can be overhead.
Read full review
ServiceNow
  • Effective Enterprise Risk Management
  • Holistic Real-time Monitoring of your technology and Risk
  • Negative - Asset Management has some issues and Ghost / Shadow IT is big issue
Read full review
ScreenShots

codeBeamer ALM Screenshots

Screenshot of Baselined tracker management with suspected linksScreenshot of Versioned test management for automated and manual testing (with parametrized test cases)Screenshot of Easily exportable & automated dashboards and reports for management and audit supportScreenshot of Gapless traceability throughout the development lifecycle