CodeSignal vs. InterviewStream Hire

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CodeSignal
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
CodeSignal is a technical skills assessment platform that enables companies to quickly hire qualified candidates for technical roles. With over 70 coding languages and tools and a built in plagiarism checker, companies can be confident that the candidates they select will be successful in their new roles.N/A
InterviewStream Hire
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
InterviewStream Hire is a video recruiting solution. Some key features include: Pre-Recorded Video, Live Video with ZOOM, Fully Customized Experience and Share Videos.N/A
Pricing
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsContact vendor for a demo and for custom pricing options.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

CVViZ
CVViZ
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Handshake Talent Engagement Suite
Handshake Talent Engagement Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Handshake Talent Engagement Suite
Handshake Talent Engagement Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(115 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.3
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CodeSignalInterviewStream Hire
Likelihood to Recommend
CodeSignal
I think code signal is one of the best platforms for organizations to better test the resource for their coding skills. Its way of conducting the test saves engineering time, reduces the risks that hiring companies have in technical interviews, and provides a cheating-free environment. The platform can be improved to make the new learners practice well on the platform and get used to it.
Read full review
InterviewStream
I always recommend this product to companies of all sizes who are looking for a reliable way to add virtual interviewing to their assessment strategy. There are 50+ vendors in this space right now but none of them have been around as long as InterviewStream. Their product is especially good for high volume scenarios but we've used it for all levels from executives down to hourly employees. We even used it internally for succession planning interviews and internal mobility
Read full review
Pros
CodeSignal
  • The test cases are quite well-written, and the grade we earn as a result of them is very fair. Users can use a unit testing tool to perform their own unit testing, allowing them to double-check their code before submitting it.
  • Intensive technical interview preparation
  • The online evaluation option is an excellent approach to assess candidates.
  • Simple UI for Simple Operations
Read full review
InterviewStream
  • Simple interface. It's not a flashy product with claims of artificial intelligence or machine learning, etc. It just gets the job done for a fair price.
  • Reliable. While we have had some minor issues from time-to-time with live interviews, the recorded interviews have worked fine in several countries around the world.
  • Support. Our customer success person was always available and helpful.
Read full review
Cons
CodeSignal
  • The platform should provide candidates with detailed feedback, allowing them to identify areas for improvement if necessary.
  • Furthermore, despite the fact that the assessment is complete, the platform prioritizes speed. In order to finish the assignment on time, people may be forced to forgo quality or desired output.
  • They should improve the question selection procedure, as some of the questions are too long to finish in the allocated time.
Read full review
InterviewStream
  • Reporting could be better. Would love to see more stats around where our users are dropping off, invited vs. completed metrics and ROI numbers as well.
  • A better database of technical interview questions.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
CodeSignal
I give it this rating because it is very easy to use. Not only that it is proctored and trusted. Moreover, the candidates find it easy to use given that it is a single test. This means that we get much more applications than using other platforms. This helps us to hire better faster and easier with codesignal.
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Usability
CodeSignal
It's very straightfoward to use and simple. For our use case in coding interviews, we generate a link, give it to the candidate and we never got any complaints or questions asked, they were able to follow our scenarios perfectly.
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
CodeSignal
Yes, the staff has been very quick
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Performance
CodeSignal
Yes, pages load quickly, reports comes in a reasonable time frame, only when CodeSIgnal integrates, it provide small glitches.
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
CodeSignal
I am not sure whether or not they have replaced but surely emerged as a big competitor. Their support system should be good knowing that they are in completion with the best hackerrank. I feel they could do a much better job but I have not used their support much
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
CodeSignal
It has clear details for every staff to understand the basic, and staffs can communicate efficiently to provide strong backgrounds. Also, the manager who provided this training has collaborated well with the Codesignal staff so that everyone could learn more about CodeSignal and look at it from different users' perspectives. So the training was really helpful
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Online Training
CodeSignal
There were some issues with the compiler
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
CodeSignal
It just works
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
CodeSignal
Codesignal provides features like screen recording and monitors candidates while they take the assessments, thereby reducing the possibility of cheating during the assessment, which is a known problem with other providers like HackerRank. Codesignal also provides predictive coding scores, which helps to better assess the capabilities of the candidates.
Read full review
InterviewStream
We looked at several video interview companies when we made a purchase decision. With the exception of HireVue, they're all about the same. We just went with InterviewStream because they had the most experience in the industry and their pricing was fair. HireVue is a premium product who tries to distance themselves from the video interview space by claiming that they are a collaboration/training tool or an AI assessment tool. They're wayyyy overpriced for what they offer if you just want video interviewing. And their sales process is high pressure and a little bit slimy to be honest. If you need a proven tool that has been around, InterviewStream is good.
Read full review
Scalability
CodeSignal
It works on multiple departments.
Read full review
InterviewStream
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
CodeSignal
  • It has been advantageous in terms of saving time for our interviewees due to its simpler approach.
  • My coding abilities have greatly improved and continue to aid me in the interviews process.
  • The User Interface has caused me to spend more time on this application and has prompted me to discover new and more productive development techniques.
Read full review
InterviewStream
  • We took a 7 step interview process in one of our high volume areas down to 3 steps. This saved 2 weeks in time to hire and increased our conversion rate with top candidates by 20% (presumably because we moved faster).
  • We saved $100,000 minimum in travel expenses in the first year. We don't know the exact amount because much of these costs are hidden in the business, but we could track at least $100k in hard costs.
  • Negatively, I'd say we lost a little bit of street credibility on sites like glassdoor where people would vent that they didn't like recorded video interviews. Over time that feedback dwindled as this strategy has been adopted by more companies.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CodeSignal Screenshots

Screenshot of candidate evaluation using languages, frameworks, and tools unique to the job including JavaScript, Python, PHP, React, Ruby, and SwiftScreenshot of a live remote and on-site interview using CodeSignal's pair programming solution with high definition video and CodeSignal's advanced IDE environment.Screenshot of an analysis of a large volume of assessments.