Cohesity Helios vs. Tivoli Storage Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cohesity Helios
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cohesity Helios is a data management platform from Cohesity, headquartered in San Jose, which provides users with end-to-end protection for virtual and physical workloads, databases, applications, and storage with a single web-scale solution.N/A
Tivoli Storage Manager
Score 4.8 out of 10
N/A
Tivoli Storage Manager from IBM is a data protection & backup and disaster recovery solution.N/A
Pricing
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Considered Both Products
Cohesity Helios
Chose Cohesity Helios
Veeam is a great Product for backup and Restore. But you have to manage a lot of Components for this Solution. You must have extra Storage System where the backup is stored. Cohesity has its own Storage. It is only one Point where you have to configure the Backups. You have to …
Tivoli Storage Manager

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Cohesity Helios
8.9
44 Ratings
10% above category average
Tivoli Storage Manager
1.8
4 Ratings
127% below category average
Universal recovery9.939 Ratings3.02 Ratings
Instant recovery9.982 Ratings3.04 Ratings
Recovery verification8.237 Ratings2.02 Ratings
Business application protection7.139 Ratings1.02 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations8.941 Ratings2.03 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.942 Ratings2.03 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.034 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression7.144 Ratings2.03 Ratings
Snapshots8.942 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.040 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard9.944 Ratings1.03 Ratings
Platform support8.944 Ratings1.04 Ratings
Retention options9.044 Ratings1.04 Ratings
Encryption9.942 Ratings1.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(44 ratings)
2.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(2 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(36 ratings)
8.3
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
8.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
8.8
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cohesity HeliosTivoli Storage Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
Cohesity
Cohesity is very well suited to protecting virtualised workloads and is a significant improvement over IBM Spectrum Protect which we’ve replaced by Cohesity. We also protect a Netapp workload and whilst the on-prem side works really well careful planning of protection jobs is needed if you’ll be archiving these to Cloud.
Read full review
IBM
Tivoli does well running file-level backups, but Exchange is clunky and restores are really hard. With no SharePoint agent, if you use SharePoint you will need another product like AvePoint DocAve. The web-based GUI console is MUCH improved over earlier versions, but you will still need to be a command-line guru to make Tivoli do everything, and local (node) config files still rule. This product was originally ported from Unix and retains may of its 'nix roots.
Read full review
Pros
Cohesity
  • Instant spin up of test and dev machines is pretty amazing. Our last solution claimed to do this but the backing storage was much too slow t be of use.
  • Uploads to the cloud are simple to set up and you can leverage low cost blob storage.
  • The cluster nature of the solution makes upgrades seamless with zero downtime.
  • The entire cluster fits in 2U of space -- we are saving 8U in our main datacenter and all 6U we previously had offsite.
Read full review
IBM
  • The concept of "forever incremental" is very appealing to my understanding of how backups should happen.
  • The backups are tuned for fast restores and they sure are fast.
  • The media management is very good.
Read full review
Cons
Cohesity
  • Replication performance - We needed support to provide some customizations in order to get our replication to work properly to another offsite cluster. We have been told that this issue is fixed in the newest general release.
  • Support - I would characterize the support as very good, but in a few instances I could tell my support agent needed to go higher up his chain to get clarification on features. I believe Cohesity is rapidly growing their support infrastructure as they put more hardware in the field.
Read full review
IBM
  • performance degradation in server database backups after upgrades
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cohesity
It's reasonably priced and works well, we actually just bought a new larger cluster late last year
Read full review
IBM
Not required, company closed. TSM is not used in my current role at my current job.
Read full review
Usability
Cohesity
The Cohesity platform with its user interface is easy to implement, rack space-saving, and easy to use on a daily business basis. Backup jobs and policies are easy to define, multiple machines and objects can be grouped for the same tasks. In general, Cohesity makes backup admins' lives much easier.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cohesity
Cohesity support is wonderful to work with. If your case is assigned to someone who is outside of your time zone, you are able to ask for it to be reassigned to someone in your time zone and no offense is taken; in fact, some of the support agents will call out that they see the time zone difference and if you want the case assigned to someone in your time zone, please request it be re-queued so that proper attention is given to it. This is rare in my experience and it makes it wonderful to work with them. I usually only request it be re-queued when I have a system down or severely degraded and need to work on it immediately. Great people to work with!
Read full review
IBM
The few times we've called for support we eventually got an answer, but it's IBM and a very big company and getting to a support agent is hard.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cohesity
The layout of how to implement consistency should be thought through beforehand. Changing it after the application is time-consuming.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cohesity
We looked at Veeam and although it's a great product when we priced out the licensing of both primary and disaster datacenters it became much too expensive. Rubrik is a great product and very similar to Cohesity. In the end, Cohesity had a secondary storage play as well as a better UI and better compatibility with lower tier cloud storage. We also like the way Cohesity did protection jobs vs Rubrik's virtual machine centric backup. CommVault is a product we still use today due to its massive features and the ability for bare metal backups. Cohesity does a much better job in the area of UI simplicity, virtual backup ease, and ease of management.
Read full review
IBM
can manage backup and archive data across disk arrays, tape libraries or optical storage and can automatically move data
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Cohesity
Cohesity Helios was included with our Cohesity DataPlatform purchase. The pricing to refresh our backup and software with Cohesity was less than our annual backup software renewal from our previous solution.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Cohesity
Overall Cohesity professional services like the rest of Cohesity are brilliant. We had some poor advice around how to carve up our Netapp protection jobs which has set us back but it has been acknowledged that a mistake was made by Cohesity and they promise for future engagements with new customers the lessons learnt with us will be integrated into their planning workshop for NAS onboarding.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cohesity
  • Savings from a unified platform to manage secondary and archival data.
  • Savings from retiring older tape backup solution, which had very high licensing and running costs.
  • Offloading snapshots from costly tier 1 storage to Cohesity.
  • NFS/SMB shares replaces the older file storage.
  • Help with disaster recovery planning and implementation.
Read full review
IBM
  • Simple, care free backups, especially if you do not use tapes and do not have to manage those.
  • Very fast restores as the libraries have everything available online.
  • Ease of locating the necessary data to restore
Read full review
ScreenShots