Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BMC AMI DevX
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
An enterprise ready, low-code Git-based DevOps toolchain that enables all developers to connect, transform and modernize mainframe application with CI/CD automation, integrated developer environments (IDE), AI/ML-based application performance monitoring and visualization dashboards, and automated testing.N/A
PractiTest
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
PractiTest is presented as a cloud-based test management tool that provides its customers with an end-to-end system to meet testing and QA needs. It is described by the vendor as flexible but methodological, enabling organizations to ensure visibility and communication at all levels. The solution aims to help users and project development teams streamline and manage their testing processes, while providing management with a clear and simple view of their project status at all times.
$39
user
Pricing
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$39.00
user
Enterprise
$49.00
user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
BMC AMI DevX
-
Ratings
PractiTest
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Small Businesses
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BMC AMI DevXPractiTest
Likelihood to Recommend
BMC Software Inc.
It's pretty good at creating an extract of a whole table, but not the best at grabbing all related tables in my experience. Pretty intuitive on setting up your test data categories. I also really like that it can either run via ISPF or via Topaz which was included with our purchase.
Read full review
PractiTest
PractiTest works GREAT as a test case repository. It is very easy to gather metrics, filter, and sort based on custom fields. We were able to work with the API to pull our automation results in as well. The support team is always very quick with their responses and monitors the "in-app chat." They are very open to answering questions, providing best practice materials, and looking for additional feedback. If you already have a central location for all of your test cases and testing needs, then I guess you probably wouldn't need to add another. However, PractiTest has high capability and potential, so if it's set up properly you can easily save time managing your tests.
Read full review
Pros
BMC Software Inc.
  • Extract/load data from one DB or table to another masking the data for testing.
  • Compare extracts against each other to ensure good baselines.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Effective Test case template.
  • Can integrate with different Atlassian products.
  • Report generation.
Read full review
Cons
BMC Software Inc.
  • I find it more obtuse to use than IBM Optim.
  • Related tables are difficult to incorporate.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Linking the defect with Jira throws an error quite some times which can be improved in the future.
Read full review
Support Rating
BMC Software Inc.
Support has been amazing compared to Optim. Further, new features are very regular with File-AID - I can't remember the last time Optim had a significant update. File-AID support is very receptive to feature requests and reported bugs, including sending out hotfixes quickly.
Read full review
PractiTest
The chat button is available to anyone who logs into PractiTest. In my experience, the support has always been very quick, very friendly, and very thorough. They make sure that your question is answered in a way that you understand it. They also provide documentation of best practices so you are never left hanging on what to do next.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BMC Software Inc.
Optim is more user friendly in how it operates, in my opinion. It's less obtuse to figure out how to extract and mask the data required compared to File-AID. Further, Optim is easier to gather related tables, by far. I do prefer using File-AID via the Topaz GUI much more than using Optim via its GUI. Finally, I personally believe that File-AID is significantly faster to run than Optim - this could be a configuration issue.
Read full review
PractiTest
I've used many different Test Case Repository tools, and while each of them has its perks, I like the capabilities of PractiTest best. When creating a test in qTest for example, you can only input information into the fields provided, and you have everything set up in a folder tree structure. With PractiTest, we are able to create custom fields and filter our tests based on those fields to provide more accurate information in a readily available format while quickly searching for the filter instead of through a folder tree. TestRail did not appear to meet our needs as a company. It just didn't have the potential that we found with PractiTest. Zephyr for example worked seamlessly with Jira, which is really nice since that is what we use for the most part. However since we cater to many different clients, we needed an external Test Case repository so we could use something that wasn't tied to 1 Jira instance.
Read full review
Return on Investment
BMC Software Inc.
  • Saves time creating production like data for testing.
  • Keeps that data safe from developers and need-to-know only.
Read full review
PractiTest
  • Test Reporting
  • Defect Management
Read full review
ScreenShots

PractiTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of