Likelihood to Recommend CLM is best suited for Medium to Large size corporations, in my opinion. Organizations need to be informed in order to be successful; they must have a team prepared to own and manage the CLM tool once implementation is complete. Great for B2B and B2C. Highly recommend it to those in question about purchasing for their organization.
Read full review Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.
Read full review Pros You don't have to worry about different clauses. You can just create them and bundle them based on your Contract. Conga contracts come with great redline and true-up features which makes the negotiation process way easy. You can integrate it with Conga composer to generate the Contract document and also can integrate it with Conga sign to send the generated contract for signature. Read full review UI/UX - tagging and naming feels much easier than you'd expect machine learning to feel Accuracy - Kira's built-in models perform well out of the box Assistance - Kira's support team gets back to me same day if I have a question Read full review Cons X-author for Word can be improved as it does not maintain a stable connection and the org gets disconnected frequently. It does not support grandparent relationship for merge field population. A separate package needs to be installed for the integration of CPQ and CLM tools from Conga. Read full review Inability to relabel smart fields to suit the review process means it is hard to align it to particular projects (e.g. it would be useful to relabel the "Assignment" smart field as "Is the contract assignable?") Not enough non-English smart fields. Needs the ability to resell user-trained smart fields in a marketplace. Output is not customizable enough. Built-in analysis tools are useful but a little basic. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Simple and easy to use for the legal team to creates contracts in Salesforce and with the help of conga contract attaches the different clauses through the bundle and sends them for negotiation and for signature. This is the primary work they do from Conga contracts. We had solution which is build using conga contracts, conga composer and conga sign
Read full review Usability For users, the software is very intuitive. For admins, there's a learning curve.
Read full review If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.
Read full review Reliability and Availability We never faced any issue till date
Read full review Performance Everything is perfect
Read full review Support Rating Very very difficult to get support. The support team is great for simple, general questions. If we ran into anything complex, we usually would figure it out before they could help us. We often were bounced around from rep to rep
Read full review Customer Support is excellent. The online help portal is probably the best I have ever seen. Great videos with content easily found. The HelpLine is staffed by knowledgeable people. The videos have saved us providing a lot of in-house training, which we would struggle to resource. The account managers really know the product and their law firm clients and share best practices and trends.
Read full review In-Person Training Conga University is very well made. Loved it!
Read full review Online Training Conga university is best! loved it. The courses are very well designed which made learning easy and great.
Read full review Implementation Rating The process involved Salesforce object creation and fields with installing conga contracts and conga composer and setting up security for the users
Read full review Alternatives Considered Features and Functionality: Conga CLM offers a range of features such as contract authoring, automated workflows, collaboration, version control, reporting, and analytics. It is designed to streamline the entire contract lifecycle. When comparing against other solutions, organizations should assess the specific features and functionalities they require and evaluate how well Conga CLM meets those needs.Scalability: Conga CLM is suitable for large enterprises and organizations dealing with high contract volumes and complex contract processes. It provides the scalability to handle a significant number of contracts, multiple users, and integration with other systems. Organizations should consider the scalability of Conga CLM in relation to their own contract management needs.
Read full review Kira offers a lot more out of the box than other providers and is also more flexible around integrations. This, plus the clear pricing structure, is why we went for it instead of (or as well as) others. Diligen, RAVN, Leverton, Della, Seal not in list.
Read full review Scalability We are fully satisfied with the over all experience using conga contract
Read full review Return on Investment We really never saw a great ROI. We installed and then were left alone for many years despite many calls for help. We were able to get out of a spreadsheet. We did have an approval flow that allowed us to view where in the process each contract was, but the approval flow was also very difficult to manage and was not able to handle complex approval flows. Read full review Positive ROI: Increased comfort level of attorneys and use of tech Neutral ROI: It has not significantly change how we handle projects, since there still is a need for manual review Negative ROI: It has been cost prohibitive to scale it Read full review ScreenShots