CONTENTdm vs Workfront Library

• Constant URLs
• User interface is good
• Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear

Read full review

• Upload and download files
• Easy to navigate without too much training
• Stores what you need in one place

Read full review

• As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
• Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
• The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.

Read full review

• The UI is a little clunky
• We are missing the functionality to quickly add metadata to the contents of a whole folder at once
• The search function can be a little hit or miss

Read full review

• It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost.
• As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects.

Read full review

• Reduces the risk of not knowing where a certain asset is stored
• No more file retrieval fees
• Everything located in one place that everyone can access
• But ..... it’s a painful process locating all your files and setting it up. No fault of the DAM

Read full review