Copado vs. IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Copado
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Copado is a Native Full DevOps Solution for Salesforce from the company of the same name in Chicago, designed to support fast, error-free releases. Its value stream maps enable users to visualize a team’s delivery process, identify bottlenecks, and gather metrics and insights on time and quality. Users can automatically merge and manage Salesforce XML with dynamically created release plans and 12 types of deployment steps, including full profiles. In March 2021, Copado acquired New…N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery, available on IBM Cloud, allows users to provision an integrated toolchain using customizable, shareable templates with tools from IBM, third parties and open source. Automate builds and tests with Tekton-based delivery pipelines, and control quality with analytics.
$0
Pricing
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Lite
$0.00
Professional
$35.00
Authorized user per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Copado
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
8.5
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Task Management00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.84 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings8.73 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Search00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Copado
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
7.6
6 Ratings
0% above category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Code Review00 Ratings7.45 Ratings
Code Collaboration00 Ratings7.85 Ratings
Velocity Calculation00 Ratings6.84 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings7.25 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Craft
Craft
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
AWS CodePipeline
AWS CodePipeline
Score 9.1 out of 10
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(2 ratings)
8.5
(16 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CopadoIBM Cloud Continuous Delivery
Likelihood to Recommend
Copado Solutions
When we have a large organization and number of changes and deployments are more than we should go for Copado. As we know it is a paid managed package and the cost is high so for dealing with fewer deployments it is not preferable to buy. Copado is well suited for users who don't have much technical understanding. So those users can see the User interface select the changes that need to be deployed by selecting the metadata. From Git operation to deployment all is handled by Copado itself. Copado has reduced the efforts for creating the package.xml and direct deployments can be done within a few clicks. Another Major aspect is that it can be directly synced with Jira or Azzure board from where the user stories will be synced and actions can be performed accordingly. For small organization, Copado can be expensive and to set up and maintain we need a technical person to do so.
Read full review
IBM
It provides a cloud-based integrated development environment that integrates with other IBM Cloud services to provide a streamlined development workflow. This includes real-time collaboration and code sharing capabilities, making it easy for teams to work together on projects. This feature is very useful for our app to maintain the code
Read full review
Pros
Copado Solutions
  • Metadata Deployments
  • Data Deployments
  • Salesforce CPQ deployments that require a lot of various Data
  • Transferring deployments between teams.
Read full review
IBM
  • It contains the deployment templates which are much more time saving and is of great use.
  • This has the integration of the Cloud applications which makes the work much more convenient.
  • This is flexible when it comes to development, deployment, and delivery.
  • [It] also has a much more reasonable pricing.
  • Provides space for the data storage.
  • [IBM Cloud Developer Tools] also can support many useful tools.
Read full review
Cons
Copado Solutions
  • Back promotions are sometimes difficult and behave in a weird manner
  • After the deployment to production next changes in the pull request shows all the changes from the previous release as well
  • Cannot be used through mobile
Read full review
IBM
  • Its price is quite high and this made it unsuitable for us as we cannot afford such high rates.
  • Its Setup takes much longer time and this is frustrating.
  • Its interface needs to be improved and easy even for the Newbies.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
It's a great platform to develop, run, test and deploy the applications easily. And it makes very easier and secure the implementation of continuous delivery process. For first time and experts also can use this service so easily. Great service provided by the IBM Cloud Continuous Service. There are more services that helps a lot to work on it. Thanks a lot.
Read full review
Usability
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
Nothing special to say : the UX is clear and simple.
Read full review
Support Rating
Copado Solutions
No answers on this topic
IBM
In more than a year using the IBM Cloud Continuous Delivery tool, I haven't had any major complaints or problems. However, in the last month, IBM suffered from a couple of problems through several of its services, and for a short period of time, I couldn't deploy successfully my projects. The problem was brief and was quickly fixed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Copado Solutions
Flosum is a downgrade for sure and I do not recommend it. Gearset is an upgrade and my preferred solution. Gearset has simplified the deployment path and makes it very easy to move between Salesforce instances. If there are any difficulties with Gearset they also have the best customer support for any deployment tool I've tried. Overall I'd say Gearset is #1, Copado #2 and Flosum a distant #3.
Read full review
IBM
We chose IBM Cloud Developer Tools for multiple reasons. Cost, current infrastructure vendor list, and Cloud Operations team experience were key driving factors for us. Palo Alto's Prisma Cloud product was slick for sure but we found it more difficult to deploy and integrate with our current environment and applications
Read full review
Return on Investment
Copado Solutions
  • It has reduced the efforts to create package.xml manually and deploy the changes
  • Another positive impact is that we can track the commits to which org they have reached in an organized way and we don't need to maintain them separately
  • For setting Copado it take a lot of time and training is required for the complete setup which is time-consuming
Read full review
IBM
  • This has made the configuration files much easier to access.
  • Has made the commands more logical as well as easy for use and learning.
  • Contains great AI capabilities
  • The documentation needs improvement.
  • Error received from commands are pretty hard to understand.
Read full review
ScreenShots