Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. RFP360

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform, including technology from the former Determine Selectica CPQ solution acquired by Corcentric in April 2019, is designed to provide a customizable CPQ solution to cover an enterprise's need to offer many possible permutations of combinations of product and service in a streamlined fashion.N/A
RFP360
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
RFP360, from Responsive (formerly RFPIO) is used by organizations to request information, respond to requests and connect, aiming to make the RFP and proposal process more efficient, effective, collaborative, consistent and repeatable for everyone.N/A
Pricing
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Pricing is based on use case and client requirements.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Proposal Creation & Organization
Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
-
Ratings
RFP360
9.0
5 Ratings
13% above category average
Proposal templates00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Proposal content library updates00 Ratings9.25 Ratings
Guided proposal creation00 Ratings8.74 Ratings
Searchable proposal database00 Ratings9.85 Ratings
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow
Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
-
Ratings
RFP360
9.5
5 Ratings
16% above category average
RFP management & response00 Ratings9.85 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval00 Ratings9.65 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls00 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface00 Ratings9.33 Ratings
Proposal Delivery
Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform
-
Ratings
RFP360
9.7
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Proposal content tracking00 Ratings9.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Small Businesses
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Esker
Esker
Score 8.9 out of 10
QuoteWerks
QuoteWerks
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
Conga CPQ
Conga CPQ
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Corcentric Source-to-Pay PlatformRFP360
Likelihood to Recommend
Corcentric
It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
In my opinion, RFP360 is well suited for any mid-to-large-scale RFP/Search project. It is probably overkill for smaller, less extensive projects, and time required for setup might outweigh any potential efficiencies.
Read full review
Pros
Corcentric
  • Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
  • The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
  • Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Sleek, modern design
  • Fast to use
  • Efficient
  • CSM team walking you through steps
  • Upload past RFPs to pick and pull
Read full review
Cons
Corcentric
  • Model builder's sluggishness.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Handle PowerPoint Templates
  • Detect duplicates before saved
  • Nothing else
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Corcentric
Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up!
Read full review
Usability
Corcentric
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface
Read full review
Support Rating
Corcentric
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
Excellent support during the training process. Since we were onboarded, we have not had too many questions, but when we did, they were answered promptly and thoroughly. We have been very satisfied.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Corcentric
No answers on this topic
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
onboarding and training were great
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Corcentric
I used Saleslogix.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Corcentric
  • yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
  • reduced sales cycle.
  • Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.
Read full review
Responsive (formerly RFPIO)
  • Quicker RFP turnaround time leads to money saved.
  • Better RFP responses lead to more closed business.
  • Better team alignment lead leads to high efficiency.
Read full review
ScreenShots

RFP360 Screenshots

Screenshot of Proposal responders dashboard.Screenshot of Proposal scoring dashboard, for proposal issuers.Screenshot of RFP responders landing page.