Craft vs Digital.ai TeamForge, formerly from CollabNet

Likelihood to Recommend

Craft is really well suited for any size design team - I have used it within a team of 3, and within a team of 30.It helps with collaboration within the team, and between external teams through 'sync' with Invision.It increases efficiency of using Sketch with things like 'data', 'duplicate', and 'stock'. These tools not only make designing faster, but also more realistic, allowing us to 'test' our designs sooner.

Read full review

Evan Jaffe

Sr. Product Designer

Four Winds InteractiveComputer Software, 201-500 employees

View all 4 answers on this topic

CollabNet TeamForge is more well-suited for technically knowledgeable users such as developers, systems analysts, QA but not for non-technical users due to the technical data used throughout the tool. CollabNet TeamForge is appropriate for most applications development. In any industry especially suited for high demand software delivery environments.

Read full review

Trung Pham

Senior Developer

PIMCOInvestment Management, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Pros

Craft is built to digital products developers, so its workflow is great.
It has a very nice interface and is a beautiful tool.

Read full review

Raphael Sanguinete

Diretor Criativo e Produtor

RebuliçoEntertainment, 1-10 employees

View all 4 answers on this topic

Code security.
Code migration.
Agile tie-in.

Read full review

James Milholen

Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps)

Freddie MacFinancial Services, 5001-10,000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Cons

Could use a more robust implementation of rich text editor.
Some functionality that requires plugins, for example, advanced field management, should be part of the core install.
It should be a bit easier to brand the control panel w/logo and color scheme.

Read full review

Ben Seigel

Principal

Versa Studio LLCInternet, 1-10 employees

View all 4 answers on this topic

I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.

Read full review

Trung Pham

Senior Developer

PIMCOInvestment Management, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Support Rating

Craft 9.6

Based on 3 answers

Responsive chat with founders to answer any questions you have.

Read full review

Verified User

Consultant in Engineering

Banking Company, 1-10 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Digital.ai TeamForge, formerly from CollabNet 9.0

Based on 2 answers

They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.

Read full review

James Milholen

Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps)

Freddie MacFinancial Services, 5001-10,000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Craft has a completely unique tool set that has functionality that really is not duplicated any where else in the industry. It cannot really be compared to any other tool I have had experience with, especially with the larger cloud infrastructure that Invision has built around their plugin and their platform.

Read full review

Evan Jaffe

Sr. Product Designer

Four Winds InteractiveComputer Software, 201-500 employees

View all 4 answers on this topic

CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.

Read full review

Trung Pham

Senior Developer

PIMCOInvestment Management, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

We used the free version of Craft, so it had a positive impact for us.
Craft helped us undestand how to manage some parts of our projects, so it had a positive impact for us.

Read full review

Raphael Sanguinete

Diretor Criativo e Produtor

RebuliçoEntertainment, 1-10 employees

View all 4 answers on this topic

Unfortunately, I do not have access to ROI information.

Read full review

James Milholen

Senior Continuous Integrations Specialist (DevOps)

Freddie MacFinancial Services, 5001-10,000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

General

Free Trial

Yes

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Yes

Entry-level set up fee?

No

Craft vs Digital.ai TeamForge, formerly from CollabNet

Craft

Digital.ai TeamForge, formerly from CollabNet

Pros

Cons

Support Rating

Alternatives Considered

Return on Investment

Screenshots

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

Free/Freemium Version

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

General

Free Trial

Free/Freemium Version

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

Add comparison