Crownpeak Digital Quality Management (DQM) vs. UserWay

If you have a fully customized cms and have people working on the site with html and css knowledge this is the best tool ever, all specifics can be checked. Using ab tests and optimization services we identify best practices of the website and everywhere the best practices aren't implemented we find using the custom checkpoints. Aspects that cannot be automated via a quick IT solution is turned into a checkpoint and that's great!

Accessibility on websites today is usually a convoluted process of testing and re-designing, but with Userway, the process is smooth. So for someone making their own simple marketing website for their small business, Userway could potentially save their company thousands of dollars and countless hours of development time and stress.

• Ensures quality and consistency of content implementation across distributed teams and markets.
• Quick and easy content updates across global digital ecosystems.
• Custom checkpoints to identify, highlight and manage business updates across multiple websites (e.g. product detail, terminology, customer messaging, brand updates)

• Turnkey solution for website compliance
• Easy to implement
• Automatic updates allow you to maintain compliance without constant updates.

• It would be helpful if the Issues page under Website showed the WCAG level for each issue (A, AA, AAA). You currently have to look up the guideline to find the level.
• There is no indicator that a page is currently being scanned. During a website scan, some of the reports are blank or missing information. Having a notification on the main page showing which websites are being scanned would be helpful.
• Some ADA compliance items are left off, such as keyboard navigation, tabbing, etc.
• It doesn't view the websites on mobile devices or if using a screen reader. Some pages or formatting changes depending on resolution. The DQM, from what I have seen, doesn't account for that.

• Violations Widget when managing UserWay appears to be incorrectly tallied

We've seen competitors, they're not doing as well of a job as dqm is. It's a wonderful tool and there a huge opportunities for crownpeak

I had a small learning curve in order to become fluent with the platform as it doesn't work like the other automated accessibility tools that I've used. However, once I was up to speed, I like it better than any of the other tools and find the data more useful, digestible, and relevant.

Haven't had issues accessing the dashboard when needed.

No issues with speed and performance

Online support [is] always quick to reply and usually [has] a fix ready and implemented within hours. Regular catch-ups with Account Managers [have] ensured that issues are addressed even more quickly, with the ability to see the results within days following a re-crawl of the sites. Suggestions for improvement are always taken on board.

Product is straight-forward but the training was helpful and beneficial

Ensure that you are ready with a solid process to address issues

Crownpeak Digital Quality Management (DQM) has all the tools in one dashboard for all possible needs of a website to resolve SEO and other issues. Whereas WordPress is more of searching for the right plugin to assist in finding all the issues you might have a need to address.

There are no other competitors that would compare to Userway and I feel like I've been around long enough to have tried every single one of them.

haven't had issues accessing when needed.

• When driving Customer Care, it was great to be able to add the Autofix tool to the web estate - a quick-win that really drives the accessibility agenda.
• Building reports off the back of DQM gives senior stakeholders an understanding of the importance of usability and accessibility.
• The gamification of league tables highlights to stakeholders the areas that need focus and budget in order to improve.

• Allows us to maintain compliance
• Positive view from customers who see we are a compliant business