CSI ETABS vs. Oracle Utilities Opower Energy Efficiency Cloud Service

For High Rise Buildings I would prefer E-tabs only, as the other scope are projct situated in earthquake peone zone will be easy to design a and analysis the sesmic waves with recent input data. Also for steel structures, as E-tabs provide most details in RCC.

Incentivized

Opower is a good tool. I don't have any real problems with it other than the fact that we have to run 4 batch programs to supply them with all the data they need. Any reduction in custom programs is a big win for my company as the cost of ownership is high.

Incentivized

• Loads distributation as it is our main concern
• Providing rebar quantity as well as providing a full 3d model object of rebar's
• Providing quanttity sheets and material specification in final output

Incentivized

• Provides week over week data to customers in an email.
• Provides suggestions to customers to curtail their usage and save money.
• Presents the data in an easy to read format.

Incentivized

• First E-tabs need to work on ease of load chnaging on an particular object after analysis as it reduce time and confusion between elements
• The rebaring model on final output should be have more editing options as it will help in understanding and easy to use
• Need to work on stairs rebar as it is also one of more important

Incentivized

• We have to run multiple batch programs to generate the extract files for Opower.
• The extract process is a little inefficient.
• We receive communication from multiple parties at Opower when there are issues. If issues came from 1 email address, that would be helpful. This is very nit-picky though.

Incentivized

Support is good. I work with 2 or 3 people at Opower when something goes wrong with our reported data. They respond in a timely manner with meaningful information. The only thing that might be helpful is to have any responses come to use via 1 common email address like support@opower.com so I can easily recognize that there's an Opower problem.

Incentivized

The only reason where I would hose the E-tabs is its commands which are easy to use and it also probide rebar shedule for whole project and also provide the model of rebar which gives me clear idea and helps from manual calculations.

Incentivized

I haven't reviewed or used any tools like Opower before. I've only been using the service for a year or so and find it to be straight forward. I don't see any real issues with it and the fact that it's now an Oracle product means that base integrations with the rest of the Utility Suite would be possible in the future.

Incentivized

• Well as we alnalysis structure its has positivite effect for continuing the project further.
• Expected Data @ times leads to disappointment as we need more details to save time
• Working on E-TAb s in a customize organisation helps to provide result

Incentivized

• We are able to fulfill our state regulatory requirements fairly easily with the tool.
• The reporting to Opower is automated through batch programs so it doesn't require manual work.
• We sometimes generate and send the data to Opower but they report they didn't get it. This requires manual intervention to send the same file again.

Incentivized