Cura GRC vs. MetricStream Platform

Cura GRC is well suited for automating much of the work associated with documentation, risk management reports, and compliance activities that are most associated with corporate governance and business objectives.

Incentivized

MetricStream is well suited for when you need to pull a report into Excel for further analysis. It is not good for when information needs to be entered as this is all done manually by analysts and managers. If we can implement a way to take parts of uploaded documents and have the system automatically enter the information in the designated fields in MetricStream, it would cut out lots of manual work for our department.

Incentivized

• Enables us to better manage business risks and create a safer workplace
• Enables us to manage the risk of loss resulting from inadequate internal processes

Incentivized

• Easy to navigate.

Incentivized

• Online support
• It would be great if they offered a mobile version.

Incentivized

• Speed/efficiency.
• Missing functionality: Uploading documents (Excel sheets) into MetricStream and being able to pull information from that form into the program.
• Improve number of outages and time that it is out for.

Incentivized

The online support is not so efficient.

Incentivized

Archer is more risk-management-friendly in that it has a better interface and more room to conduct risk-related tasks and pull reports.

Incentivized

• Better risk control
• Better financial control

Incentivized

• It keeps records of all of our vendors and the corresponding documents.
• Other departments can access information on vendors.

Incentivized