Cynet 360 vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics (UBA)

All type of malicious attacks on endpoints whether it is known threat or unknown. Better ransomware & zero-day coverage.It helps organization with deeper visibility in to security incidents,unmatched protection & incident response service.

Incentivized

Splunk User Behavior Analytics application is necessary when any company wants to capture the threat based on user behavior instead of just counting the number of occurrences of particular event. With Splunk UBA, we can analyse number of anomalies captured and which in turn creating threats which are nearly true positive.

Incentivized

• Lots of information to analyze
• Strong services expertise
• Comprehensive host information analysis

Incentivized

• Monitor and troubleshoot for any system errors.
• Get the insights on application data sets and do some predictive analysis.

Incentivized

• Glitches in the dashboard, some alerts don't reflect.
• UI is a little complex..

Incentivized

• Performance-wise, it can be improved. Queries take a long time.
• Dataset exploration - More data visualization charts can be added.

Incentivized

It's simply better, more robust, easier to use user interface, better CyOps support, packaged solution without needing all the add-ons of the noted solutions.

Incentivized

Easier we were using Splunk Enterprise on heavy forwarder on which all the add-on were installed and were using Splunk Cloud with respect to search head and indexers stack. And with Splunk Enterprise Security premium app, we were relying on correlation rules which were throwing more number of false positive but after implementing Splunk UBA, we are now getting real-time true positive threat or incidents.

Incentivized

• Protected us from advanced threats.

Incentivized

• Fewer team members to work on real threats.
• Less time required to deal with real incidents.
• Easy to implement across the network.

Incentivized