8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.5 out of 100
211 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.1 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

D2iQ Mesosphere

Mesosphere is well suited for orchestrating workloads. It supports Docker as a container as well as support others. It is highly suitable for running resilient and auto recovering big data/application containers. Mesosphere has proven time and again to be production ready at a massive scale. It supports native single button/API call scale up and scale down and supports various deployment patterns like Blue-Green and others.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

Docker is great for when you would want to use a VM for any given application, but don't need the overhead of the whole OS. Docker containers use very little computing resources, boot up very quickly, and are very easy to set up. An instance where Docker may not be appropriate would be for an application that requires good security. If in this situation, a true VM would probably be your best bet.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • Deploying mesosphere and friends (e.g. marathon)
  • Deploying applications (e.g. Cassandra, Jenkins, Spark) on to mesosphere
  • Providing value add components such as velocity, and marathon-lb
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

  • Containerization - allowing multiple micro-services to function together without in-depth orchestration at the VM level.
  • Rapid deployment - a developer with appropriate access can simply push to the correct remote and the deploy happens automatically from there
  • Decouples provisioning from VM administration - allows containers to be deployed (more) regardless of VM set up.
Ben Lachman | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • Setting up is a bit of a hassle, especially ZooKeeper state management and mesos and marathon quorum.
  • Occasionally, I observed some failures when deploying something onto Marathon. Logging or detailed error reporting can help.
  • Stale containers and inconsistent states resultant of the cluster failure are hard to solve and need a complete system restart to get it back to normal state.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

  • As a NON-heavy user, definitely it's a bit intimidating in the onboarding phase. It's hard to understand what everything is for and how to use it appropriately. As I wrote before, this could be because I'm not a hard developer myself.
  • At least on Windows 10, I always have problems turning it on. It has problems starting, I need to quit/start again, and then it works. I'm supposed to have a stable version, not sure if it's only myself.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

D2iQ Mesosphere

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise) 8.0
Based on 2 answers
Docker's CLI has a lot of options, and they aren't all intuitive. And there are so many tools in the space (Docker Compose, Docker Swarm, etc) that have their own configuration as well. So while there is a lot to learn, most concepts transfer easily and can be learned once and applied across everything.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

D2iQ Mesosphere

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise) 8.0
Based on 6 answers
The community support for Docker is fantastic. There is almost always an answer for any issue I might encounter day-to-day, either on Stack Overflow, a helpful blog post, or the community Slack workspace. I've never come across a problem that I was unable to solve via some searching around in the community.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

D2iQ Mesosphere

I happen to like mesosphere because it integrates well with a Jenkins based workflow, Deis is a little more Heroku like and it's not clear how to fit that model into a continuous-integration process. Kubernetes has also been criticized for being complicated.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

Prior to docker, we had a custom build and deployment system. For local development, we use VirtualBox to host our VMs, while our custom VMs resided directly on the servers. We chose Docker primarily to allow us to get rid of our custom deployment system, both simplifying build and deploy processes and reducing the support needs of our own custom solution.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

D2iQ Mesosphere

  • I see mesosphere as having a positive impact overall on the industry trending Docker and containers in general.
  • Seeing how mesosphere helps and simplifies things for the developer and ops, it is definitely a game changer.
  • Native support of on demand scaling up and down as per the need is one of the best features.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

  • With Swarm we managed to have the horizontal network bandwidth scale to gather data from clients on slow internet connections
  • A minor negative is that you always need at least 3 nodes for redundancy, which makes it less ideal for quick proof of concept type scenarios.
Vlad VARNA | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

D2iQ Mesosphere

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Mirantis Cloud Native Suite (Docker Enterprise)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison