OpenText Data Protector vs. Veritas Enterprise Vault

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Data Protector
Score 4.9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.N/A
Veritas Enterprise Vault
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Veritas Enterprise Vault is a file archiving option.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Data Protector
8.2
10 Ratings
1% above category average
Veritas Enterprise Vault
-
Ratings
Universal recovery7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Instant recovery7.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Recovery verification9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Business application protection7.99 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations8.89 Ratings00 Ratings
Incremental backup identification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Backup to the cloud7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression8.29 Ratings00 Ratings
Snapshots8.45 Ratings00 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.25 Ratings00 Ratings
Management dashboard7.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform support8.37 Ratings00 Ratings
Retention options8.87 Ratings00 Ratings
Encryption8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Small Businesses
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Amazon S3 Glacier
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(10 ratings)
7.5
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.4
(6 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.7
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.5
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Data ProtectorVeritas Enterprise Vault
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Well suited: scenarios with very specific backups schedules; backups saved in tape libraries. Less appropriate: environments with older Operational Systems and older hardware, such as tape libraries.
Read full review
Cohesity
I recommend Enterprise Vault, especially over native Exchange archiving when: 1. You have, or may need litigation holds and searches 2. There is a need to archive and set defined retention periods for Journaling 3. You have lots of duplicate large emails that you want to get deduplication of 4. You need/ want to be able to search attachment in addition to emails 5. You want or need Litigation searches or archive retention to be handled by a team separate from your Email team
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • It is very reliable on the server side to provide a trustworthy back end.
  • The install was simple and provided an easy way to install and backup Unix servers.
  • The support was always helpful and responded quickly.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • EV FSA had 2 stubbing options. We ended up using the IE shortcut as the stub replacement on the file system. In the DFS environment using DFSR the IE shortcuts allowed us to quickly and easily archive the data while allowing users to still access their data via the web or stub format. We were also able to exclude certain folders from archiving like the dfsrprivate folder. The newer versions of EV 11 and up have a better user interface to access this content from the web.
  • EV SharePoint implementation was pretty simple for us. Document Library archiving was pretty seamless. Archiving the different versions in sharepoint also helped further reduce total cost of storage.
  • EV Exchange was a good addition to our archiving portfolio. In our case we did not use the stubbing mechanism. Instead, we used the vault cache methodology. We had the option to pull down the full archive versus just the header information. The concern at the time was how quickly we could update the vault cache on the client. We ended up scaling out our EV environment to ensure the push of data could get to all our clients since we were in the middle of a notes to exchange migration. Overall I was impressed with Vault Cache and its capabilities. I also liked the ability to manage the Vault Cache and perform resets where necessary from the web browser interface.
  • We had EV FSA, SharePoint and Exchange as one single environment so we benefited from overall single instances of a file. Our backend systems were Netapp which we enabled deduplication for further improve storage savings. EV had a good SQL Reporting mechanism for Archiving and plenty of good canned reports.
  • Speed of archiving data was pretty fast.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Increase the range of support for new platforms.
  • Improve the attention of support cases in terms of speed of attention.
  • Keep me better informed of the latest solution updates.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • The search function in the vault does not work very well.
  • Cost. If not planned diligently, it might add to the overall cost.
  • Not easy get a expert to address the issue fast.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
It was just not a good fit for our organization. We have an EMC SAN, Data Domain backup storage, and VMWare. Without any other HP software or hardware in our environment I do not see the need to continue using a product that is not well integrated with our other brands
Read full review
Cohesity
Symantec Enterprise is one of the best in the industry. We have already deployed their product to thousands of devices in the company and it would be a huge project to go through and change to an alternative product. We have also had much luck in dealing with their customer support. They have been very pleasant to deal with and their technical support has been quite knowledgeable in fixing our issues. This leaves us with very little reason to switch to a new product. We would have to see a significant amount of cost savings to switch to an alternative that offers all the same features and modules.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
Very easy to use. What needs to improve is to make it easier to configure some integrations and features, such as office 365 integration, acropolis integration, block change-based backup, etc. Despite we have documentation, even following all the steps, the integration is hard to implement or doesn't work in the end.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Performance
OpenText
The Reporting-Server and the Reports depend on the settings.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
It is the weak point of this software, although it is improving little by a little. The first level of support does not solve almost anything until you move on to a higher level that is more involved.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
OpenText
Pick one person to help you through the process.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
When selecting a backup solution for our virtual environment we chose HP Data Protector for its cost savings in licensing, our familiarity with the software and the ability to backup to disk, tape or both with the standard installation.
Read full review
Cohesity
I haven't research any other software against Enterprise Vault. Office 365 automatically has archiving capabilities that we use in the cloud. In comparison to Office 365, I'd say Office 365 comes out on top. For one thing, we essentially don't have to manage it. It also seems to preform better. However, Enterprise Vault does very well if you have an on-premise email solution.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
OpenText
Here the license model from the Micro Focus Data Protector and DP4CW should merge. It causes argumentation problems if you license two products here.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Scalability
OpenText
We use the tool in different installations and combinations of functions and hardware.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
OpenText
The professional services had some details of low promptness in the attention of cases.
Read full review
Cohesity
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Positive impact. I have not worked with HP Data Protector enough to provide the ROI. It simply worked when we needed it to.
Read full review
Cohesity
  • Helps on the data management life-cycle, moving unused data to cheaper storage and/or deleting it after some time, if required.
  • Also helps reducing the amount of data to be backed up on the active array.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OpenText Data Protector Screenshots

Screenshot of Reporting Dashboard