30 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100
76 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

Databricks has helped my teams write PySpark and Spark SQL jobs and test them out before formally integrating them in Spark jobs. Through Databricks we can create parquet and JSON output files. Datamodelers and scientists who are not very good with coding can get good insight into the data using the notebooks that can be developed by the engineers.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

It is perfectly suited for statistical analyses, but I would not recommend JMP for users who do not have a statistical background. As previously stated, the learning curve is exceptionally steep, and I think that it would prove to be too steep for those without statistical background/knowledge
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

BI Standard Reporting

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.3
Pixel Perfect reports
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0
Customizable dashboards
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.7

Ad-hoc Reporting

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.8
Drill-down analysis
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.9
Formatting capabilities
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.3
Integration with R or other statistical packages
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.0
Report sharing and collaboration
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.2

Report Output and Scheduling

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.5
Publish to Web
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
7.5
Publish to PDF
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.6
Report Versioning
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
7.0
Report Delivery Scheduling
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Data Discovery and Visualization

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.9
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.0
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.1
Predictive Analytics
Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.6

Pros

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

  • It supports all data science programming languages like Python and R
  • it takes very few minutes to deploy models into production
  • it has tools that ensures collaborations between developers
Kofi Joshua | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

  • JMP is designed from the ground-up to be a tool for analysts who do not have PhDs in Statistics without in anyway "dumbing down" the level of statistical analysis applied. In fact, JMP operationalizes the most advanced statistical methods. JMP's design is centred on the JMP data table and dialog boxes. It is data focused not jargon-focussed. So, unlike other software where you must choose the correct statistical method (eg. contingency, ANOVA, linear regression, etc.), with JMP you simply assign the columns in a dialog into roles in the analysis and it chooses the correct statistical method. It's a small thing but it reflects the thinking of the developers: analysts know their data and should only have to think about their data. Analyses should flow from there.
  • JMP makes most things interactive and visual. This makes analyses dynamic and engaging and obviates the complete dependence on understanding p-values and other statistical concepts(though they are all there) that are often found to be foreign or intimidating.
  • One of the best examples of this is JMP's profiler. Rather than looking at static figures in a spreadsheet, or a series of formulas, JMP profiles the formulas interactively. You can monitor the effect of changing factors (Xs) and see how they interact with other factors and the responses. You can also specify desirability (maximize, maximize, match-target) and their relative importances to find factor settings that are optimal. I have spent many lengthy meetings working with the profiler to review design and process options with never a dull moment.
  • The design of experiments (DOE) platform is simply outstanding and, in fact, the principal developers of it have won several awards. Over the last 15 years, using methods broadly known as an "exchange algorithm," JMP can create designs that are far more flexible than conventional designs. This means, for example, that you can create a design with just the interactions that are of interest; you can selectively choose those interactions that are not of interest and drop collecting their associated combinations.
  • Classical designs are rigid. For example, a Box-Benhken or other response surface design can have only continuous factors. What if you want to investigate these continuous factors along with other categorical factors such as different categorical variables such as materials or different furnace designs and look at the interaction among all factors? This common scenario cannot be handled with conventional designs but are easily accommodated with JMP's Custom DOE platform.
  • The whole point of DOE is to be able to look at multiple effects comprehensively but determine each one's influence in near or complete isolation. The custom design platform, because it produces uniques designs, provides the means to evaluate just how isolated the effects are. This can be done before collecting data because this important property of the DOE is a function of the design, not the data. By evaluating these graphical reports of the quality of the design, the analyst can make adjustments, adding or reducing runs, to optimize cost, effort and expected learnings.
  • Over the last number of releases of JMP, which appear about every 18 months now, they have skipped the dialog boxes to direct, drag-and-drop analyses for building graphs and tables as well as Statistical Process Control Charts. Interactivity such as this allows analysts to "be in the moment." As with all aspects of JMP, they are thinking of their subject matter without the cumbersomeness associated with having to think about statistical methods. It's rather like a CEO thinking about growing the business without having to think about every nuance and intricacy of accounting. The statistical thinking is burned into the design of JMP.
  • Without data analysis is not possible. Getting data into a situation where it can be analyzed can be a major hassle. JMP can pull data from a variety of sources including Excel spreadsheets, CSV, direct data feeds and databases via ODBC. Once the data is in JMP it has all the expected data manipulation capabilities to form it for analysis.
  • Back in 2000 JMP added a scripting language (JMP Scripting Language or JSL for short) to JMP. With JSL you can automate routine analyses without any coding, you can add specific analyses that JMP does not do out of the box and you can create entire analytical systems and workflows. We have done all three. For example, one consumer products company we are working with now has a need for a variant of a popular non-parametric analysis that they have employed for years. This method will be found in one of the menus and appear as if it were part of JMP to begin with. As for large systems, we have written some that are tens of thousands of lines that take the form of virtual labs and process control systems among others.
  • JSL applications can be bundled and distributed as JMP Add-ins which make it really easy for users to add to their JMP installation. All they need to do is double-click on the add-in file and it's installed. Pharmaceutical companies and others who are regulated or simply want to control the JMP environment can lock-down JMP's installation and prevent users from adding or changing functionality. Here, add-ins can be distributed from a central location that is authorized and protected to users world-wide.
  • JMP's technical support is second to none. They take questions by phone and email. I usually send email knowing that I'll get an informed response within 24 hours and if they cannot resolve a problem they proactively keep you informed about what is being done to resolve the issue or answer your question.
Wayne Levin | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

  • Better Localized Testing
  • When they were primarily OSS Spark; it was easier to test/manage releases versus the newer DB Runtime. Wish there was more configuration in Runtime less pick a version.
  • Graphing Support went non-existent; when it was one of their compelling general engine.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

  • In general JMP is much better fit for a general "data mining" type application. If you want a specific statistics based toolbox, (meaning you just want to run some predetermined test, like testing for a different proportion) then JMP works, but is not the best. JMP is much more suited to taking a data set and starting from "square 1" and exploring it through a range of analytics.
  • The CPK (process capability) module output is shockingly poor in JMP. This sticks out because, while as a rule everything in JMP is very visual and presentable, the CPK graph is a single-line-on-grey-background drawing. It is not intuitive, and really doesn't tell the story. (This is in contrast with a capability graph in Minitab, which is intuitive and tells a story right off.) This is also the case with the "guage study" output, used for mulivary analysis in a Six Sigma project. It is not intuitive and you need to do a lot of tweaking to make the graph tell you the story right off. I have given this feedback to JMP, and it is possible that it will be addressed in future versions.
  • I've never heard of JMP allowing floating licenses in a company. This will ALWAYS be a huge sticking point for small to middle size companies, that don't have teams people dedicated to analytics all day. If every person that would do problem solving needs his/her own seat, the cost can be prohibitive. (It gets cheaper by the seat as you add licenses, but for a small company that might get no more than 5 users, it is still a hard sell.)
Eric Burton | TrustRadius Reviewer

Likelihood to Renew

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS 10.0
Based on 16 answers
JMP has been good at releasing updates and adding new features and their support is good. Analytics is quick and you don't need scripting/programming experience. It has been used organization wide, and works well in that respect. Open source means that there are concerns regarding timely support. Cheap licensing and easy to maintain.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

Databricks Lakehouse Platform 9.0
Based on 1 answer
This has been very useful in my organization for shared notebooks, integrated data pipeline automation and data sources integrations. Integration with AWS is seamless. Non tech users can easily learn how to use Databricks. You can have your company LDAP connect to it for login based access controls to some extent
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS 10.0
Based on 5 answers
The overall usability of JMP is extremely good. What I really love about it is its ability to be useable for novices who have no coding experience, which is not the case with most other, similar, programs. It can output a fast and easy analysis without too much prior coding or statistical knowledge.
Shelby Bowden | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS 9.2
Based on 8 answers
Support is great and give ease of contact, rapid response, and willingness to 'stick to the task' until resolution or acknowledgement that the problem would have to be resolved in a future build. Basically, one gets the very real sense that another human being is sensitive to your problems - great or small.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Online Training

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS 7.9
Based on 3 answers
I have not used your online training. I use JMP manuals and SAS direct help.
Mark Davis | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

I also use Microsoft Azure Machine Learning in parallel with Databricks. They use different file formats which teach me to be flexible and able to write different programs. They are equally useful to me and I would like to master both platforms for any future usage. I do prefer Databricks because it could be free if I decided to go with the Databricks Community Edition only.
Ann Le | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

We selected this as a corporation perhaps it was relatively easily available and thus knowing that if you know a bit of any coding language you can somewhat get by with JMP, makes this an easily scalable software in terms of learning for people. I am not too sure about other alternatives.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

  • Rapid growth of analytics within our company.
  • Cost model aligns with usage allowing us to make a reasonable initial investment and scale the cost as we realize the value.
  • Platform is easy to learn and Databricks provides excellent support and training.
  • Platform does not require a large DevOPs investment
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

  • ROI: Even if the cost can be high, the insights you get out of the tool would definitely be much more valuable than the actual cost of the software. In my case, most of the results of your analysis were shown to the client, who was blown away, making the money spent well worth for us.
  • Potential negative: If you are not sure your team will use it, there's a chance you will just waste money. Sometimes the IT department (usually) tries to deploy a better tool for the entire organization but they keep using the old tool they are used too (most likely MS Excel).
Gabriel Chiararia | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

Pricing Details

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Databricks Lakehouse Platform Editions & Modules

Edition
Standard$0.071
Premium$0.101
Enterprise$0.131
  1. Per DBU
Additional Pricing Details

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS Editions & Modules

Edition
Personal License$125.001
Corporate License$1,510.002
  1. Per Month
  2. Per Month Per Unit
Additional Pricing Details

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
8.0
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
8.6

Likelihood to Renew

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Usability

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
9.0
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Reliability and Availability

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Performance

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Support Rating

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.2

Online Training

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
7.9

Implementation Rating

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
9.6

Scalability

Databricks Lakehouse Platform
JMP Statistical Discovery Software from SAS
10.0

Add comparison