Datamatics TruBot vs. SAP Build

Best suited for: 1. Processing complex, bulk and multiple source of data 2. working with SQL Database 3. Automating any web browser based activities Not appropriate: 1. Automation of mMacro based excel utilities

Incentivized

As mentioned, the integration between SAP Build Work Zone and SAP BPA, SAP S/4HANA, and Ariba was easy to follow once all requirements were met. However, there is not much information, or at least the SAP Documentation is not easy to follow to set up the right landscape that meets all the requirements; this was the case with the IAS and IPS configuration, where we needed the support of BTP Architects.

Incentivized

• Datamatics RPA TruBot's intelligent component helps business owners to make smart decisions. It is integrated with cognitive capabilities and application programming interface.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot automates a high volume of rule-based tasks in a short span of time and accuracy, which allows employees to perform high value tasks.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot gives analytics, which help in timely reporting, which leads to streamlining the processes.

Incentivized

• Unattended Automation.
• Attended automation.
• Connecting to the backend SAP system (ECC or S/4).
• Can also talk to non SAP world.
• Doesn't require skills strictly pertaining to BPA. In fact, even a RPA developer can build logic.

Incentivized

• The tool is not very compatible [with the] cloud. They heavily rely on on-premises deployment. [It would be nice to have more] cloud adoption.
• The license model needs to be modified. Licenses should not be tied to a machine or a user, instead, they should be with the number of active instances.

Incentivized

• Reusability of components in sap build apps.
• Limited development platform support.
• Desktop agent not available for MAC OS.
• Offline mode.
• Accessibility feature.

Incentivized

It's really a good platform and they always create a unique way to solve the issue.

Incentivized

The interface is very modern, web-based, no deep technical knowledge is required to use SAP Build Process Automation. It works with drag and drop, configuration and almost no coding is needed. Actually, we had to write code only for one specific small business logic. All the rest could be done in a no-code manner.

Incentivized

Datamatics is ready to do the process studies and give you solutions from their side.

Incentivized

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

The [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more simple and easy to understand for a nontechnical person as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. Also, [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more cost-effective and provides better support as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. [Datamatics] RPA TruBot provides free training sessions, where else [Azur Systems] provides paid certifications.

Incentivized

Bubble.io is more user-friendly in comparison with SAP AppGyver. The latter being practically a free tool provides enough functionality to achieve results though while Bubble.io doesn't let you export your projects without a paid subscription. Bubble.io has great initial tour and tutorial integrated into the platform that can be handy for any new beginner while SAP AppGyver can be a little overwhelming.

Incentivized

• [It] reduced the number of working hours required.
• [It] increased [the] employee and customer satisfaction rate.
• [It] increased efficiency by three-fold.

Incentivized

• Lower costs for development and automation
• Very easy to use
• Integrates existing applications with pre-built APIs, components, and templates for SAP and non-SAP applications

Incentivized