DaVinci vs. Ezus

Unlike Adobe where one needs to use several apps to do editing, motion graphics, and sound editing, DaVinci has all these capabilities in one app. In addition, the tool is free—save for a one-time purchase for additional features—allowing one to avoid being trapped in a subscription. The app runs smoothly and rarely has bugs in new updates

Incentivized

The presentation looks appealing and functional but when one starts using the app, one soon realizes that it doesn't work properly. It's not possible to insert all the data one needs, like beginning time, duration of the tour, description and detailed relative to meeting point and time. It's possible to insert (not in an organized manner) some of this data manually, but it's not possible to import an existing database and make it work

• Editing
• Color Correction
• Motion Graphics

Incentivized

• Easy delivery exports for multiple timelines at once
• Being able to change the aspect ration in the edit tab
• Reactive solid backgrounds for Text FX (not Text+)

Incentivized

The app does not work with existing databases. All data needs to be entered manually. It doesn't offer the precision required to create travel itineraries and travel documents (not all services appear where they are supposed to). They do not design tailored documents, so many details that should be automatically inserted are in fact missing and one needs to enter them manually for each service, making the app a bit more usable than a couple of excel sheets but nothing more than that.

As I said earlier, it avoids a subcription like Adobe and it has much more powerful VFX capabilities than Final Cut Pro.

Incentivized

Good rates for an excellent team

Incentivized

• It's allowed our video team to meet our video quota goals

Incentivized