Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued) vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Since it's acquisition in 2011 Compellent became a Dell product line of storage solutions (e.g. Dell Compellent Storage Center). Compellent products became part of the Dell EMC SC Series of enterprise flash and SAN storage devices and are now EOL.N/A
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a flash storage option, from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
Pricing
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Considered Both Products
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)

No answer on this topic

HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Chose HPE 3PAR StoreServ
The 3PAR is faster, easier to use, takes up less space and is much easier to expand than a VMAX system. We compared the 3PAR head to head against XtremIO and Compellent and chose the 3PAR for its combination of performance, features and price (Compellent was cheaper, but did …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Enterprise Flash Array Storage
Comparison of Enterprise Flash Array Storage features of Product A and Product B
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)
8.3
3 Ratings
9% below category average
HPE 3PAR StoreServ
-
Ratings
Flash Array Performance8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Flash Array Integration8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Compression8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Non-Intrusive Upgrades8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Simplicity9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Power Savings9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 9.2 out of 10
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
NetApp FAS Storage Arrays
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Pure Storage FlashArray
Pure Storage FlashArray
Score 9.2 out of 10
NetApp AFF A-Series
NetApp AFF A-Series
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(6 ratings)
9.2
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Dell SC Series / Compellent (discontinued)HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Likelihood to Recommend
Dell Technologies
All in all this series great in addressing issues applications that need flash storage as a backend storage supply. It addresses the need for fast, responsive servers that need to boot quickly. It is easy to use and for the most part there are few issues and none that can't be addressed/fixed quickly.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a great storage device for both file and block-level storage needs. You can use it in place of SAN devices required by database servers. It provides an amazing compaction ratio and, hence, reduces overall storage footprint and cost. This is, however, slightly costly if your environment doesn't really see high transactions most of the time.
Read full review
Pros
Dell Technologies
  • Dell Compellent support (Co-Pilot) and the add-on service (Optimize) are critical services that Dell Compellent does very well. Alerts from the array are sent to Co-Pilot where tickets are automatically generated and customers are notified of events. Of greater importance at times is the proactive support Co-Pilot and Optimize provide by contacting us of inefficiencies in the array and consulting on resolutions.
  • Enterprise Manager (Dell's "single pane of glass" management framework) is a useful tool for configuration/evaluation of the array and other Compellent products.
  • Ease of management. From firmware upgrades to managing server volumes the process is much simpler than with other arrays.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • We are using HP 3PAR storeServ 8200 for both our file level and block level storage.
  • I really love the amazing compaction ratio provided by HP 3PAR. Some of our disks have compaction ratio above 25:1, which is super amazing. You can definitely look for around 75% reduction of storage footprints.
  • It has a great user friendly web console "SSMC"(StoreServ Management Console). This is an additional bonus and can be used by even non-storage people like DBA and Network to take a look at storage performance.
Read full review
Cons
Dell Technologies
  • The GUI could be a little more updated with a lot more information regarding usage.
  • There could be some assistance with high I/O times where snapshots go to consolidate. There seems to be issues when that attempts to occur, and there will times where the virtual machine stuns due to the I/O intensity.
  • Modification of multiple volumes or the creation of multiple volumes is a pain in the DSM management console.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • The system requires a physical or virtual system to manage upgrades and patches and for call home features. Most other systems have this integrated into the array. Just another piece of infrastructure to manage.
  • There are some system jobs that come pre-scheduled in the initial setup, but there is at least 1 job that should be added to this by default. When you delete storage, you also need to run a job to compact the CPG (a group where the luns all reside) to reclaim the previously used storage as free. This should be done by default at least monthly in the background.
  • There are 2 different GUI front ends that can still be used. The older version (3 PAR management console) is being phased out (has been for 3 years).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Dell Technologies
No answers on this topic
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
We are very satisfied with 3PAR performance and especially the IOPS (Input Output Per Second) is pretty amazing. It is easy to configure and doesn't require much knowledge of storage for Tier 1 support team.
Read full review
Support Rating
Dell Technologies
This is not solely based on the support engineers themselves but more so that the logging and gotcha's that their array has. There have been multiple times where logs are pulled, but the folder is not large enough, and it crashes the array. Other times there are certain aspects that support either does not know of or isn't knowledgable about how to look at particular issues that could be causing problems.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
With their phone home technology, we usually have a replacement part on its way by the time we wake up in the morning, or if the event occurs overnight. We have had great support when we had questions or events that required a call.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Dell Technologies
We selected Compellent solely based on price. Honestly I would rate it only slightly better than a QNAP we used (which was even cheaper). If performance and reliability are factors in your decision (and they should be) I would recommend looking at something like a VNXe.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
We still use NetApp storage enclosures at each plant for our routine file shares (CIFS) but I would love to swap them out for the HPE 3PARs as we use for our ERP app data. The 3PARS are simply faster and much better at near-instant replication. But even more importantly we can get the reporting that we need from the 3PAR within a few minutes, even custom reports. 3PARs are much easier to manage than NetApps in general and I think that the only place that they compete is in compaction.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Dell Technologies
  • The SC9000 has been able to serve our current and futures needs well enough to not need to upgrade anytime soon.
Read full review
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • We grew unexpectedly, which forced us to buy a lot of expensive HP SSD's.
  • We have never had any performance issues with this storage.
Read full review
ScreenShots