DemandScience vs. Visually, by Rock Content

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
Visually, by Rock Content
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Visually, by Rock Content acquired in 2019 with ScribbleLive, is a content marketing solution, allowing the user to get visual, video and content creation services, on demand and at scale. Visually is designed to supply the user affordable, premium quality work with creative talent, coordinated through what is described as an easy-to-use marketing collaboration product.N/A
Pricing
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Sales Intelligence Data Standards
Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
19 Ratings
7% above category average
Visually, by Rock Content
-
Ratings
Contact information7.419 Ratings00 Ratings
Company information7.819 Ratings00 Ratings
Industry information7.619 Ratings00 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
6.3
22 Ratings
3% below category average
Visually, by Rock Content
-
Ratings
Web Personalization6.26 Ratings00 Ratings
3rd party intent signals6.613 Ratings00 Ratings
Downstream intent signals6.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Account identification6.510 Ratings00 Ratings
Buyer journey tracking5.78 Ratings00 Ratings
Revenue forecasts6.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience segmentation6.49 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion optimization4.88 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Syndication7.621 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Visually, by Rock Content
4.5
1 Ratings
56% below category average
Ideation00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content collaboration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Content calendar00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Visually, by Rock Content
4.0
1 Ratings
68% below category average
Content hub00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Forms / Gated content00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Content distribution00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Content promotion00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Visually, by Rock Content
5.0
1 Ratings
41% below category average
Audience profiling and targeting00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Content performance analytics00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Small Businesses
ZoomInfo SalesOS
ZoomInfo SalesOS
Score 8.2 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Qualified
Qualified
Score 9.1 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
6sense
6sense
Score 8.5 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(46 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(46 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceVisually, by Rock Content
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
DemandScience Activate is well suited for inclusion in paid media programs where there is an account-based focus. It's great to be able to pinpoint exactly the personas, job titles, and seniorities of those you're reaching, and see those names come through in acquisition reports. We see success in driving the right title paths into our database for nurturing.
Read full review
Rock Content
I would be less inclined to recommend Visually to a colleague now than I would have in the past. In the past, highly skilled freelance programmers and designers were more able to get matched with potential clients. Now, things have to go through Visually and creators cannot post their independent work and get matched up independently.
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • They understand the marketing funnel and have created product to support each step of the journey.
  • DemandScience is agile in how they work with their clients. They were willing to modify their processes to accommodate ours.
  • Sales does a good job of identifying our needs and making product recommendations.
Read full review
Rock Content
  • Staff picks were a great way of sifting through many pieces of content
  • It was easy to share things uploaded to visual.ly to other social media channels
  • There is an awesome amount of content on Visually
Read full review
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
Rock Content
  • There is a bias towards infographics (as opposed to 'real' data visualization)
  • It is not very clear the path between how people who need content get matched up or find creators
  • Interface was redone too often
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
Rock Content
No answers on this topic
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Rock Content
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
DemandScience
I enjoyed working with the initial rep and campaign manager, but as the campaign manager left the company, there was a gap in expertise and customer care. This drop-off in quality of care was notified internally and caused team members to raise concerns. Hopefully, we will see improvements with the most recent change in campaign managers.
Read full review
Rock Content
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Rock Content
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
The quality of leads that we got from INFUSE media was truly horrible. The leads often did not meet our qualifications set that would qualify them as MQLs and if they did, when they were reached out to, we were told they had no interest in converting and that they didn't even remember clicking the ad. So, we did not know for sure where the leads came from and we could not convert them. None of this is a problem with DemandScience.
Read full review
Rock Content
I would recommend other design studios that specialize in data visualization and infographics before visually for a few reasons: - small design studios have an emphasis on the creators (who is part of the studio), whereas Visually is more of a black box because you don't know who is creating your project - Portfolio is okay, but not great, there are many other studios with better looking portfolios One way that Visually is better is that it has an impressive client list and quicker turnaround and maybe more streamlined feedback loops.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
Rock Content
  • Was helpful in attracting clients when I started doing data visualization work
  • Cost was minimal - it was free to upload and took little time
  • I have been unable to attract clients lately from visually, so ROI has gone to 0
Read full review
ScreenShots