DemandScience vs. Scoop.it Content Director

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
Scoop.it Content Director
Score 9.9 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Scoop.it Content Director is the SMB-focused solution for Lean Content Marketing. It allows Content Marketers to: - Save time by finding quality content from across the web - Scale content output without the need for more resources - Delivers ROI; more quality content means more leads
$12
per month
Pricing
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Scoop.it Content Director
From $333/month
Billed annually
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Scoop.it Content Director
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting8.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
9.9
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
9.7
(8 ratings)
Usability
6.2
(3 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(69 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.3
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceScoop.it Content Director
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
Scoop.it
Scoop.it does have collaboration features so you can have more than one admin add content to a topic, but there is no platform for collaboration or drafting of content. It is easy to try out the free version and get a good idea of what the application does, and then add on features from there
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
Scoop.it
  • Provides suggestions daily for each of your topics depending on keywords you choose. There is no guesswork about what to share.
  • Allows sharing of your content to various social media outlets with the touch of a button. Your content gets spread quickly.
  • Your own beautiful front page functions as your website. It shows the curator profile, and all your topics.
Read full review
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
Scoop.it
  • When we first implemented the usage of Scoop.it the topics of search were very limited, but as the popularity grows, so does the number of searchable topics.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
Scoop.it
Right now, it does not cost me anything. I am extremely happy with the service and product. It serves my needs for research.
Read full review
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Scoop.it
Well thought out UI
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
DemandScience
No answers on this topic
Scoop.it
The search engine housed within Scoop it delivers the most up to date articles based on the criteria I have provided it.
Read full review
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
Scoop.it
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Scoop.it
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
Scoop.it
We used both social sites and as a personal preference, I liked Scoop.it considerably more because of the layout of the site and the ease of the user experience. It was also much easier to share content. I like to think of Scoop.it as the "short, sweet and to the point" website that gives me exactly what we need, when we need it and the manner in which it easiest to use.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
Scoop.it
  • I'm afraid we haven't been able to measure ROI, but we definitely have a stronger, more graphic impact in social media
Read full review
ScreenShots

Scoop.it Content Director Screenshots

Screenshot of Smart CalendarScreenshot of Content SourcingScreenshot of Analytics