The DigitalOcean App Platform enables developers to build, deploy, and scale apps on what they describe as a simple, fully managed PaaS.
Users of the former Nanobox, acquired by DigitalOcean in 2019, have been migrated to the App Platform upon Nanobox's end of life in March 2021.
$5
per month
Netlify CMS
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Netlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.
N/A
Pricing
DigitalOcean App Platform
Netlify CMS
Editions & Modules
Basic
$5
per month
Professional
$12
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DigitalOcean App Platform
Netlify CMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DigitalOcean App Platform
Netlify CMS
Features
DigitalOcean App Platform
Netlify CMS
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
DigitalOcean App Platform
6.8
2 Ratings
17% below category average
Netlify CMS
-
Ratings
Ease of building user interfaces
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scalability
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform management overhead
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform access control
4.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Services-enabled integration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Development environment creation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Development environment replication
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue recovery
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
DigitalOcean App Platform
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.0
1 Ratings
25% below category average
API
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
DigitalOcean App Platform
-
Ratings
Netlify CMS
6.1
1 Ratings
24% below category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
I would only get into it if I where willing to pay for the support plan and getting some assurances from the team as to where they are headed. The platform itself is great and can save you a ton of hard work and money. but it's hard to be confidant in it's sustainability.
Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
The company has not been very communicative as of lately. Not much news, no apparent work on missing features.
Some components are incomplete as far as some critical features. For example, I use RethinkDB as my database and it's missing critical features like backup and clustering, so It is unusable and they should have made that clear from the get go.
The pricing on the support plan is vague. I do have the feeling it is actually well worth the money, but it's hard to form a decisions based without more predictable specific.
Seems to me like the platform's future is unclear.
It can help you to host your virtual appliance or serverless application at very low cost. DigitalOcean marketplace also helps you to deploy the serverless app or virtual appliance effortlessly. It is suitable for small scale deployment and the process to setup an account and roll out your app via marketplace is easy and cheap.
We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.