Docmosis vs. PDFTron

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Docmosis
Score 10.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Docmosis is used by software developers and tech users who require a template-based document generation component for their custom software applications. Using Docmosis, business documents can be customized for recipients by: Providing the dynamic content in JSON/XML format AND Creating templates in either LibreOffice or Microsoft Word with simple merge fields used to denote the dynamic input. A wide range of customized business documents including…
$50
Monthly
PDFTron
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
PDFTron is a provider of document processing technology boasting thousands of customers across industries, headquartered in Vancouver. PDFTron’s SDK enhances software applications with dynamic document viewing, annotation, processing, and conversion capabilities, as well as features such as document understanding, data extraction, and redaction. PDFTron technology supports major platforms and file types, including support for PDF, MS Office, and CAD formats.N/A
Pricing
DocmosisPDFTron
Editions & Modules
Cloud
$50.00
Monthly
Tornado
$2895.00
Docmosis-Java
$2895.00
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DocmosisPDFTron
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DocmosisPDFTron
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

User Ratings
DocmosisPDFTron
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DocmosisPDFTron
Likelihood to Recommend
Docmosis
With customer support and flexibility in handling specific, unique scenarios, they are able to provide solutions quickly. There are no scenarios currently which we are aware that it may be less appropriate. If you have very large documents you should review architecture choices on how best to optimize your performance using Docmosis.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
PDFTon is best suited for larger organizations in order to maximize the multiple features and functionality and to justify the cost. The users will need a programmer that can develop solutions to deploy using multiple programming languages. They need to be able to understand how the different types of code can interact. Small organizations would have a hard time justifying the cost and may not have the skill sets to deploy it easily.
Read full review
Pros
Docmosis
  • Docmosis is excellent at support and will work with you to find a solution for your particular use cases.
  • During our evaluation process, they were very helpful to get us up and running and we were one of the first docker based implementations so they worked quickly to get our infrastructure support setup.
  • Their solution is very flexible and allows several ways to allow support dynamic document generation at a very good value.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
  • Great customer support
  • New releases with added features
  • Very configurable
Read full review
Cons
Docmosis
  • There isn't much in terms of what could be improved, but the only challenge we have which is in terms of future scaling and isn't a limitation, but just something we're trying to be cognizant of as it might increase our infrastructure costs. Since we have large numbers of multi-nested document templates, and large documents. Although Docmosis did help us reduce the time to generate our largest documents by a large percentage. This is likely an area of improvement that all providers would need to address.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
  • Lowering the cost
  • Remove evergreen clause from contract
Read full review
Support Rating
Docmosis
They always respond to support and provide resolutions quickly and even provide the ability for new features/support to be incorporated very cooperatively by help with with alternate solutions as necessary.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Docmosis
We also evaluated Winward Studios solution along with HotDocs, we selected Docmosis for the following reasons:
1. We were using docker very early on, so they were very cooperative in helping us get our infrastructure working during the early evaluation phases, and went above and beyond to help with some of our template processing efforts.
2. When we were looking to improve the processing speed due to our complex large number of dynamically inserted templates, Docmosis was helpful with ideas. We were able to improve speed quite significantly with Docmosis' help by managing some dynamic aspects of our templates and including them inline vs. having them loaded dynamically.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
PDFTron was our first choice because it was the best solution we could find at the time. it was the most versatile and easiest for us to deploy mostly because of the great support they provided. I had the opportunity to meet with them prior to purchasing and they seemed like a company that would continue growth of the product and listen to their customers for improvements.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Docmosis
  • Very strong impact on ROI as it's value has been able to scale with our user growth.
Read full review
PDFTron Systems Inc.
  • It has allows our organization to stay ahead of the competition.
  • The demonstrations we perform for potential customer are very impressive
  • Our customers appreciate the versatility of features
Read full review