Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com) vs. Whitespark Local Citation Finder

As a former writer, the tools that DupliChecker offers are of a great deal. They are vital and useful for my day-to-day work. I always see to it that my work is free from plagiarism and it does not infringe upon other people’s works. It also helps me deliver my words in a clear and concise manner.

Incentivized

We have a client base within our organization of about ~5,000, so it can be difficult to keep track of all of their marketing status/standings. The Whitespark Local Citation Finder removes the aspect of human error and ensures that we are providing fast, reliable results for thousands of our clients. Being able to see our competitor's citation summary is a large advantage, not other products such as this provides.

Incentivized

• Has the ability to write with more than 20 thousand words.
• It offers you security when sharing your file, since there is no way to copy it.
• Offer free services.
• Your mistakes will no longer be a problem when writing, since it corrects them immediately.
• 1- Allows scanning

Incentivized

• The information within the finder is very accurate, which eliminates us having to dig through the internet for citations.
• The reports are automated for you, so there's no extra work on the user's end.

Incentivized

• Its algorithms are designed for the best performance of the data used as a user.
• We can get results quickly effectively as it leads us to dependencies of its functions while investigating each keyword.

Incentivized

• One small improvement I'd recommend is creating the ability to connect to 3rd party platforms, such as Google Data Studio

Incentivized

Sharethrough has limitation is a boon as well as a detriment since it is both offering niche inventory that can perform while also limiting itself to be within only one category of the digital inventory space. On the other hand, Dupli Checker provides better functionality for its users which helps us in various ways.

We have used BrightLocal in the past, which was a great platform. The biggest difference between Whitespark and BrightLocal is its usability. BrightLocal can be difficult to navigate, while Whitespark is much more straightforward and easily navigatable. Within our large organization, we also use the Whitespark Rank Tracker, so being able to utilize multiple Whitespark products streamlines a lot of our processes.

Incentivized

• Although a paid version is needed to convert more than 20,000 words, this platform is worth paying for, because it helps you create authentic text without grammatical errors.
• Helps our organization to avoid that any important document that has to be shared with another organization, contains plagiarism.
• The best of all is that it has first-rate technology and excellent security.
• It has an impressive color-coding scheme, so you can identify which are the duplicates and the unique ones.

Incentivized

• The positive ROI has been seen through our client's renewal %. Since we are able to provide accurate reporting, they trust the work that is presented to them more than not.

Incentivized