DX Application Performance Management vs. Opsani

CA Wily is well suited for monitoring the load balanced application nodes and determine their main performance bottlenecks like if problem exists in heap or in some connection issues. But I think when it comes to providing the entire report of the application, it is less appropriate as there is no way to create the entire report of the test for all the counters monitored. Also there is no way to detect some issues based on the system configuration.

Incentivized

Opsani works perfectly for use cases where rapid growth in both a user base and the range of cloud products has to be tuned for optimum performance, efficiency, and customer experience. It is a great addition for your existing CI/CD toolkit allowing to securely test the performance while automatically deploying optimal configurations.

Incentivized

• Alerting which can be customized by the end user.
• Visualization of the metrics and data presented to provide a unique and attractive interface.
• Flexibility to manage actions and commands that we deem important for each application. The ability to define these and customize the metrics reported for each individual application is huge for us.

Incentivized

• It allows to optimize our entire micro-services architecture.
• Easily integrates with AWS and Azure.

Incentivized

• We are facing challenges to meet RFP requirements in few areas where I would recommend CA to improve.
• We are facing challenges for non (java and dotnet application) which CA APM does not support. SAP is another solution where CA APM is not able to address our business requirement.

Incentivized

• Plugin available for Jenkins server could be more user-friendly.
• Optimization in response to environmental changes is a bit sluggish.

Incentivized

We have never received any support from CA on this product

Incentivized

We are very happy with the support provided by Opsani, however we were lucky not to encounter any major issues, which all-in-all is a very good thing. The overall experience is that the response was fast and accurate. Their support ticketing system is user friendly and easily understandable for newcomers.

Incentivized

We only have 1 application using DX APM, while most of other applications are instrumented using Dynatrace. Dynatrace provides a better monitoring and instrumentation for applications. The required effort to setup monitoring capability using DX APM is way more work compared to Dynatrace, also the amount of KPIs offered from Dynatrace is more than DX APM.

Incentivized

The main difference is the fact that apart from watching performance metrics and then providing feedback for administrators, Opsani adjusts the parameters to improve the cloud solution performance in real-time, based on unique AI algorithms input taken from application behavior. It allows optimizing not just by simply trying to find the best price, but by calibrating the cloud application configuration.

Incentivized

• Introscope is deeply utilized within the organization. However, CEM and Team Center not as much. Those that use one piece don't generally use the others. Partially because of the curve in learning how to use the consoles effectively.
• reporting is pretty well configured and easy to setup if you know how to use the tools. So this can be easy to use and takes less time to configure for the different groups within the organization.

Incentivized

• Our prediction is that it allows to achieve efficiency increase up to 60%.
• Cost reduction in our case is up to 30%.

Incentivized