Enghouse Interactive Contact Centers vs. TELUSCloud Contact Center

Enghouse Interactive Contact Centers is well suited for organizations with existing Microsoft solutions e.g. Lync/Skype for business infrastructure/Teams, Those who run Busy (1000+ calls/day) OMNI channel contact centres and depend on quality management/Quality assurance. I would say less appropriate for small to medium organizations that do not have existing PABX infrastructure.

Incentivized

A universal communication platform

Incentivized

• Allows management to easily monitor activity for calls, callers, users, and queue management
• Relatively simple UI allows users to effectively manage their communication sessions
• Provides in-depth insights to communication and work activity metrics

Incentivized

• Easy to [manage] users
• Easy to setup features
• Multiple device/apps to access the services

Incentivized

• Sound Alerts
• Detail of who hangs up the call
• Less expensive support

Incentivized

• Hardware features
• Some set up are not flexible
• Cost

Incentivized

Price. Easy to use. Support.

Incentivized

Enghouse Interactive Contact Centers compared to Zeacom is very powerful in terms of features. The support for integrating with third-party software/hardware is better, and it is much simpler to use because less training is required to upskill the contact center staff. Comes with a lot of documentation and interactive guides/manuals.

Incentivized

Shaw Smart Voice

Incentivized

• Using Enghouse to manage our inbound and outbound call communication has allowed for us to focus more time on call quality and trends, rather than how to manage the call load and where to allocate calls.
• The time spent managing server blips and failovers remains a detractor for our teams.

Incentivized

• Save on cost when combining other services
• Easier to communicate with remote employees

Incentivized