Forcepoint TRITON (Discontinued) vs Forcepoint Web Security

• It useful for the largest companies.
• Easy to manage it, after installation there's no need hardly to support it.
• Forcepoint's supports are always good, easy to communicate and quick to solve problems.

Read full review

• This package is one of the few that offers a category, quota time, that allows us to limit certain categories and or websites for staff that would normally be blocked for customers and may not be something that is needed in their day to day job duties. We allow staff one hour a day, broken down into six 10 min increments, to visit sites for shopping, travel arrangement and other areas that are more of a personal need than a business need.
• Forcepoint has a wide selection of categories that can be enabled, quota timed or restricted at a top-level or you can go more granular and drill down to subcategories to allow for only partial access.

Read full review

• There is nothing actually.
• There is nothing actually.
• There is nothing actually.

Read full review

• The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
• I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.

Read full review

• Releasing too many agent versions makes it difficult to deploy the whole organization.
• Not specifically, but we've found too many attempts about data leakage. It directly saved money.

Read full review

• It is actually a hard question to answer. As part of broader security infrastructure, it has performed well in its intended role. We have not suffered any significant breaches since it was installed. However, it is difficult to ascribe this solely to the Forcepoint Web Security. For instance, we also use the Umbrella DNS servers and they may prevent users from accessing malicious websites as well. Forcepoint provides flexibility where the DNS servers do not.

Read full review