Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs. WebTitan DNS Filter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Forcepoint SWG
Score 6.6 out of 10
N/A
The Forcepoint ONE Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is one of the three foundational gateways of the Forcepoint ONE all-in-one cloud platform. Forcepoint ONE SWG monitors and controlsany interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal filesharing accounts, detecting shadow IT, and optionally providingRemote Browser Isolation (RBI) with Content Disarm andReconstruction (CDR).N/A
WebTitan
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
WebTitan is the web security gateway and content filtering solution offered by TitanHQ.
$38
per month per 25 users (Starting Price)
Pricing
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayWebTitan DNS Filter
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
WebTitan Gateway
$38
per month per 25 users (Starting Price)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Forcepoint SWGWebTitan
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayWebTitan DNS Filter
Considered Both Products
Forcepoint SWG
Chose Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway

We currently took a look at SolarWinds MSP, WebTitan and VIPRE. I use SolarWinds Help Desk and their web filtering could integrate within that but they are unrestricted or restricted only and do not offer a feature like quota time. Their cost was about 1/3 of Forcepoint but …

WebTitan

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayWebTitan DNS Filter
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Skyhigh Secure Web Gateway
Score 6.6 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayWebTitan DNS Filter
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Forcepoint Secure Web GatewayWebTitan DNS Filter
Likelihood to Recommend
Forcepoint
Over the years, [in our experience], the maintenance of the Forcepoint Web Security solution proved to be more cumbersome and troublesome with each version upgrade. In addition, it did not transition well to support the large increase of remote workers. We also experienced weird incompatibilities with the client. We have since replaced this solution with Zscaler Internet Access, a cloud-based secure web gateway solution with a client that behaves as expected, is more flexible, and requires significantly less administration.
Read full review
TitanHQ
It is well suited for any org with the need to control the web access of their users. It has succeeded in all of our deployment scenarios such as in a school, or many non profit organizations. We do not have a need for it on our own machines.
Read full review
Pros
Forcepoint
  • It prevents users from accessing websites that may have recently been created for the purpose of distributing malware.
  • It prevents users from accidentally or intentionally accessing websites that are considered inappropriate for a work environment.
  • It allows us to create different policies for different teams in our organization.
Read full review
TitanHQ
  • Activity monitoring.
  • In terms of cost it is affordable.
  • Direct synchronization with Boundless Automation, this integration helps improve the management of networks at scale to increase efficiency, speed up operations and more.
  • It can be accessed from anywhere with an Internet connection.
  • It is intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
Cons
Forcepoint
  • The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
  • I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.
Read full review
TitanHQ
  • A mobile roaming client would be good
  • Reports for clients are sometimes fairly basic, some users prefer more in depth reports
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Forcepoint
It is very stable, the organisation has "locked in" the product and has no plans to change or try another product. We have already renewed our 2019-2020 licenses. It is user friendly and people catch on easily when they first use it. The only downtime is when we install Microsoft updates! It has excellent reporting which help in determining how the organisation's Internet is used and also during both internal and external IT audits.
Read full review
TitanHQ
No answers on this topic
Usability
Forcepoint
Despite the intimidating Linux CLI when you use the appliance for troubleshooting, the web security usability compensates as most of the Administration of the system is done there. It is GUI based and has an easy to use UI where one can navigate around rather easily like getting reports, checking alerts, looking the whole setup under deployment to check if all services are running in one place though there are other parts to the system.
Read full review
TitanHQ
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Forcepoint
The is a quick first response to acknowledge your issue and the Engineers never take more than two hours to fix an issue and we hardly get issues looking at the fact that the system is pretty stable. There is also a robust Knowledge Base in the site for known problems.
Read full review
TitanHQ
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Forcepoint
Research known issues with upgrading from the Support Knowledge base, this will enable you avoid road blocks along the way and reduce your dependence on Forcepoint Support
Read full review
TitanHQ
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Forcepoint
To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can just let it do its thing
Read full review
TitanHQ
Cost and umbrella had an issue with us as we had a hard time trying to make it work and never did figure out why it would not work. The reporting was lacking from what we could tell but again we could not get the trial working. So it was more cursory
Read full review
Return on Investment
Forcepoint
  • Being a non-profit the cost is a bit higher than some competitors so our ROI takes a bit longer to recoup. I would really like to see better non-profit pricing.
  • The ease of doing a report on someone cuts down on the IT man-hours to do website tracking for managers as we can do it from a central point whereas in the past (prior to Forcepoint/Websense) we would have to ghost their machine to look for activity as well as their local servers.
Read full review
TitanHQ
  • WebTitan DNS Filter helps keep our employees focused on the job at hand.
  • The cloud service eliminates having to trade in/up obsolete hardware every 3-5 years.
  • Initial setup and configuration is straight forward and not terribly complicated.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WebTitan Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of