FOSSA vs. Fortify by OpenText

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
FOSSA
Score 2.0 out of 10
N/A
FOSSA is a software composition analysis tool that continuously scans for open-source components and tracks dependencies and license compliance.N/A
Fortify by OpenText
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
An AppSec solution formerly from Micro Focus, spanning SCA, SAST and DAST that supports the breadth and management of any application portfolio, used to secure code. Features API discovery and testing for any application, throughout the software lifecycle.N/A
Pricing
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.5 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.8
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
FOSSAFortify by OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
FOSSA
The only issue we have had is sometimes the web app is too slow, and that causes issues with us wanting to continue to use FOSSA over going with another tool. That is the only problem. I noticed it happened more recently, but if that is solved now or will be solved, I would 100% recommend this tool to anyone!
Read full review
OpenText
SDLC deployment is simple. simple to use The coverage is thorough and complete as a DAST product.
Read full review
Pros
FOSSA
  • Setup of tool.
  • Speed of scans.
  • Automated emails with reports.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Detection of vulnerabilities
  • Scanning pipelines
  • Integration is super easy
  • Scanned cloud based applications
Read full review
Cons
FOSSA
  • Interface for loading results can be slow, this is the #1 issue we have faced.
  • Speed of scans could be improved.
Read full review
OpenText
  • Reporting could be better
  • Can be an involved setup if your organization is not using common build tools
  • Users get spammed with a lot of email updates from the service
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
FOSSA
No answers on this topic
OpenText
Since every firm needs to perform static code analysis on their applications, I believe Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect would work well for them (they also offer dynamic scanning, although I haven't used it myself). Different static analysis tools scan code in different ways, and Micro Focus Fortify WebInspect asks you to submit a complete build of the application along with debugging files. Depending on how your company builds its apps, this requirement may be simple or challenging.
Read full review
Support Rating
FOSSA
Never needed support but the chat and help seem forefront of the app!
Read full review
OpenText
Always receive excellent support from the vendor. No issues there.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
FOSSA
BlackDuck and Synk
Read full review
OpenText
Fortify Application Defender is a little more timely and upfront with a lot of their information on cyber security. we like what they provide and how they communicate with our users. I think they have a good understanding and practice in their field. they seem best suited for us and the best fit.
Read full review
Return on Investment
FOSSA
  • Hard to measure the ROI, but no doubt having licenses be above board is fantastic for protection of your software.
  • Caused developers to make more informed decisions.
Read full review
OpenText
  • DevSecOps helped in reducing efforts
  • License cost was less
  • We could roll out double the count of applications with implementation of WebInspect
Read full review
ScreenShots