GitGuardian Internal Monitoring vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
GitGuardian Internal Monitoring
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
GitGuardian Internal Monitoring helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations. GitGuardian boasts users among companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi. GitGuardian Internal Monitoring is an…
$0
per developer in the perimeter
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Prisma Cloud, from Palo Alto Networks (based on technology acquired with Evident.io, or the Evident Security Platform) is presented as a comprehensive Cloud Native Security Platform (CNSP) that delivers full lifecycle security and full stack protection for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments. The solution is dedicated to reducing attack surface and checking for vulnerabilities against known or custom signatures of threats and provides daily risk reports, and also detects what users were…N/A
Pricing
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Editions & Modules
Small Teams - 1-25 developers
$0
per developer in the perimeter
Standard 26-100 developers
$18
per developer in the perimeter
Standard - 26 to 100 developers
$18
developer per month
Enterprise - above 100 developers
adhoc
developer
Enterprise - above 100 developers
adhoc
developer
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(20 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
User Testimonials
GitGuardian Internal MonitoringPalo Alto Networks Prisma Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
GitGuardian
I do think it'll absolutely fit everyone who codes integrates with another platform or services. We all forget that one credentials one in a while, and especially those who managed public repository, it is important to keep an eye on accidentally committed credentials. While I think you don't really needs it for personal project, it's a nice to have, you don't want to waie up to 50k USD of sudden surcharge on resources you don't use.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Finding specific Cloud Vendor specific Cloud resource configuration, tags, network information and etc. is fairly easy to do. Cloud alert capabilities are pretty good and with proper knowledge top notch alerts can be created. Only downside I can think of is ease of use.
Read full review
Pros
GitGuardian
  • Secret scanning for secrets like Github OAuth Secrets
  • Git commit/push hooks, so there's a check before you even try to push to a VCS
  • Automatic rollback on accidentally pushed secerts
  • Awesome dashboard and amazing options to resolve any false-positives
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Vulnerability assessment using Twistlock
  • Enhancing Security by scanning workload based on different Security standards and provide a compliance report
  • CF template integration with CI/CD pipeline to identify any security issue before workload are deployed
  • IAM/UEBA features additional to enchaining security posture
  • Auto remediation
  • Integration is simple and solution is supported on multiple cloud
  • Customized dashboard/queries
Read full review
Cons
GitGuardian
  • Improved user interface: It would be beneficial to have a more intuitive and user-friendly interface for Internal Monitoring on GitGuardian. This would make it easier for users to quickly access the data they need and understand the results of their scans.
  • Automated alerts: It would be helpful to have automated alerts when certain conditions are met, such as when a scan reveals sensitive data or when a new repository is created. This would help users stay informed and take action in a timely manner.
  • More detailed reports: Currently, Internal Monitoring reports are limited in terms of the depth of information they provide. It would be useful to have more detailed reports that include additional metrics, such as the number of repositories scanned and the types of sensitive data found.
  • Faster scan times: Scan times can be slow at times, making it difficult to stay on top of changes in repositories quickly. It would be beneficial to have faster scan times so that users can take action quickly when needed.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Real-time supports would be much appreciated. At the moment they have a third-party ticketing support tool, which can be replaced with real-time support, which can be provided to the user at the time of the issue.
  • The user should be provided with all the learning material by the Palo Alto team at the time of license purchase. This would save a lot of users' time, which is taken up by research and finding the correct documents from the website.
  • Themes can be introduced in the feature set, which would help the user customize the software as per their needs.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
GitGuardian
We selected GitGuardian because I attended a webinar from them. And they explained excellent which security issues can be in secrets in public/private repositories and to mitigate this risks we decided to use GitGuardian. Also, the free tier is one of the things which are really great and good starting point into repository security. And it does what they promise, really good.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Our organization didn't consider any other tool, and so far we are pretty much satisfied with Prisma Cloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
GitGuardian
  • GitGuardian Internal Monitoring has had a positive impact on our overall business objectives. By providing visibility into our code repositories and alerting us to potential security risks, we have been able to identify and mitigate security issues before they become a problem. This has allowed us to focus more on developing our product and less on responding to security incidents. We have also seen an increase in customer confidence in our product as a result of using GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, which has led to increased customer loyalty and retention. Overall, the ROI of using GitGuardian Internal Monitoring has been very positive for our business.
  • We have seen an increase in the security of our codebase, as well as an improvement in the speed and accuracy of our code reviews. This has enabled us to quickly identify and address any potential security issues before they become a problem. Additionally, we have seen an increase in our ROI as a result of using GitGuardian Internal Monitoring, as it has allowed us to save time and money by preventing costly security breaches.
  • No more.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Investigation time is severely reduced
  • Has potential to identify misconfigurations
  • Hard to setup
Read full review
ScreenShots

GitGuardian Internal Monitoring Screenshots

Screenshot of GitGuardian Internal Monitoring - Monitoring ScreenScreenshot of GitGuardian Internal Monitoring - Secrets detailsScreenshot of GitGuardian Internal Monitoring - Scanning screen