What users are saying about
Top Rated
184 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.1 out of 100
Based on 184 reviews and ratings
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 7 out of 100
Based on 1 reviews and ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Google App Engine
App Engine is such a good resource for our team both internally and externally. You have complete control over your app, how it runs, when it runs, and more while Google handles the back-end, scaling, orchestration, and so on. If you are serving a tool, system, or web page, it's perfect.If you are serving something back-end, like an automation or ETL workflow, you should be a little considerate or careful with how you are structuring that job. For instance, the Standard environment in Google App Engine will present you with a resource limit for your server calls. If your operations are known to take longer than, say, 10 minutes or so, you may be better off moving to the Flexible environment (which may be a little more expensive but certainly a little more powerful and a little less limited) or even moving that workflow to something like Google Compute Engine or another managed service.
Vice President of Shared Services
CloudbakersComputer Software, 51-200 employees
Nanobox
I would only get into it if I where willing to pay for the support plan and getting some assurances from the team as to where they are headed. The platform itself is great and can save you a ton of hard work and money. but it's hard to be confidant in it's sustainability.
Co-Founder
LoroTalkInternet, 1-10 employees
Feature Rating Comparison
Platform-as-a-Service
Google App Engine
8.0
Nanobox
8.6
Ease of building user interfaces
Google App Engine
8.0
Nanobox
—
Scalability
Google App Engine
8.7
Nanobox
10.0
Platform management overhead
Google App Engine
7.7
Nanobox
10.0
Workflow engine capability
Google App Engine
7.2
Nanobox
—
Platform access control
Google App Engine
7.6
Nanobox
8.0
Services-enabled integration
Google App Engine
7.4
Nanobox
9.0
Development environment creation
Google App Engine
8.8
Nanobox
10.0
Development environment replication
Google App Engine
8.5
Nanobox
10.0
Issue monitoring and notification
Google App Engine
7.9
Nanobox
6.0
Issue recovery
Google App Engine
7.8
Nanobox
8.0
Upgrades and platform fixes
Google App Engine
8.1
Nanobox
6.0
Pros
Google App Engine
- Quick to develop, quick to deploy. You can be up and running on Google App Engine in no time.
- Flexible. We use Java for some services and Node.js for others.
- Great security features. We have been consistently impressed with the security and authentication features of Google App Engine.
Web & Mobile Developer
Bluefire ProductionsComputer Software, 11-50 employees
Nanobox
- Relatively easy setup. One file named "boxfile.xml" controls all relevant services including there communication ports, routes and build steps.
- Scaling is easy - you can put everything on one machine, split certain services to dedicated machines and scale services to multiple machines. best of all this can be done at any time with almost zero down time.
- I have not used this yet, but for a few hundred dollars a month you can get dedicated operational services to help you make your setup even easier and ensure your system is operational.
Co-Founder
LoroTalkInternet, 1-10 employees
Cons
Google App Engine
- There is a slight learning curve to getting used to code on Google App Engine.
- Google Cloud Datastore is Google's NoSQL database in the cloud that your applications can use. NoSQL databases, by design, cannot give handle complex queries on the data. This means that sometimes you need to think carefully about your data structures - so that you can get the results you need in your code.
- Setting up billing is a little annoying. It does not seem to save billing information to your account so you can re-use the same information across different Cloud projects. Each project requires you to re-enter all your billing information (if required)

Verified User
Consultant in Research & Development
Information Technology and Services Company, 51-200 employeesNanobox
- The company has not been very communicative as of lately. Not much news, no apparent work on missing features.
- Some components are incomplete as far as some critical features. For example, I use RethinkDB as my database and it's missing critical features like backup and clustering, so It is unusable and they should have made that clear from the get go.
- The pricing on the support plan is vague. I do have the feeling it is actually well worth the money, but it's hard to form a decisions based without more predictable specific.
- Seems to me like the platform's future is unclear.
Co-Founder
LoroTalkInternet, 1-10 employees
Likelihood to Renew
Google App Engine
Google App Engine 8.3
Based on 8 answers
App Engine is a solid choice for deployments to Google Cloud Platform that do not want to move entirely to a Kubernetes-based container architecture using a different Google product. For rapid prototyping of new applications and fairly straightforward web application deployments, we'll continue to leverage the capabilities that App Engine affords us.
Director of Engineering
NorthOutComputer Software, 51-200 employees
Nanobox
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google App Engine
Google App Engine 7.6
Based on 9 answers
Google App Engine is very intuitive. It has the common programming language most would use. Google is a dependable name and I have not had issues with their servers being down....ever. You can safely use their service and store your data on their servers without worrying about downtime or loss of data.

Verified User
Engineer in Engineering
Medical Devices Company, 1-10 employeesNanobox
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google App Engine
Google App Engine 8.1
Based on 21 answers
Good amount of documentation available for Google App Engine and in general there is large developer community around Google App Engine and other products it interacts with. Lastly, Google support is great in general. No issues so far with them.

Verified User
Analyst in Information Technology
Airlines/Aviation Company, 51-200 employeesNanobox
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google App Engine
We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as compared to the other major players in Azure and AWS.

Verified User
C-Level Executive in Information Technology
Computer Software Company, 11-50 employeesNanobox
The ability to choose your own cloud provider is huge, especially for a small start up like I have. We have a lot of free credit from AWS, Google Cloud, IBM, Azure, etc...The data layer is baked into the system which is better for integration then an external provider.There are also a lot fewer differences between environment as everything is Docker based which gives me the confidence that what works on my machine is going to work in production.Heroku doesn't have good support for Docker containers yet and although Heroku has served me well in the past, it is limited in some aspects.
Co-Founder
LoroTalkInternet, 1-10 employees
Return on Investment
Google App Engine
- Effective employee adoption through ease of use.
- Effective integration to other java based frameworks.
- Time to market is very quick. Build, test, deploy and use.
- The GAE Whitelist for java is an important resource to know what works and what does not. So use it. It would also be nice for Google to expand on items that are allowed on GAE platform.
Senior Principal
Trexin ConsultingManagement Consulting, 51-200 employees
Nanobox
- The platform is saving me a lot of time I would have been wasting on operations instead of development.
- The platform is saving me a lot of money as I can easily switch between cloud providers to find the best price.
- I am worried though for the price I might have to pay in case of an unexpected system issue.
- Hopefully I will be able to pay the support plan before that.
Co-Founder
LoroTalkInternet, 1-10 employees
Pricing Details
Google App Engine
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Google App Engine Editions & Modules
Edition
Starting Price | $0.051 |
---|---|
Max Price | $0.301 |
- Per Hour Per Instance
Additional Pricing Details
—Nanobox
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Nanobox Editions & Modules
—